0

Nikon, Canon way better than Olympus ?

Forums > Lenses > Nikon, Canon way better than Olympus ?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 | Next · Last
    AdiDat
    1
    India
    7 Apr 2011 - 12:26 PM
    0

    Hey
    Do you think that although Olympus is doing a great job in improving the quality of their lenses,
    it lags far behind the seasoned campaigners like Nikon and Canon?

    Your views(even if they are different than mine) are Always Welcome !!

    Regards,
    Aditya (-_-)

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    7 Apr 2011 - 12:26 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Coleslaw
    Coleslaw (e2 Member)
    6
    12761 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales27 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 12:29 PM
    0

    No.
    Canon way better than Olympus....and Nikon
    Tongue

    strawman
    7 Apr 2011 - 12:36 PM
    0

    Because of the different sensor sizes it is difficult to compare the optical performance as for example the Olympus lens has to project a higher line per mm performance to equal an APS or full frame performance. That is not to knock the Olympus lenses, but to rather point out lpmm data cannot be directly compared, as the Olympus may euphoniously look better.

    strawman
    7 Apr 2011 - 12:44 PM
    0


    Quote: euphoniously

    My typo of the week, answers on a postcard as to what the correct word should be or even what that word means. Oh the joy of spell checkers.

    cameracat
    cameracat (e2 Member)
    8
    8160 forum postscameracat vcard Norfolk Island60 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 2:31 PM
    0


    Quote: Nikon, Canon way better than Olympus

    Better at what, Knocking a nail into a piece of wood..? A better paperweight perhaps....Grin ?

    LOL....Smile Cameras have become the new " Medallion " for the guy/girl that likes to advertise what they have/wear.....!!!

    Bottom line any camera is only as good as the monkey using it......Tongue

    Thats something that will never change, No matter what medallion you have around your neck.....!!!!!

    Wink

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
    11
    8606 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 4:16 PM
    0

    Its a bit like asking if a land rover discovery is better than a lotus Smile

    There each good at there own thing, it all depends on what you want/need.

    Olympus/Panasonic, great if you want to travel light with compact kit (m4/3)

    Canon/Nikon better if you need plenty of kit and lens choice.

    And so on

    strawman
    7 Apr 2011 - 4:31 PM
    0

    I had heard that the reassuring solid build of the D3 meant that Nikon had the best camera for throwing at a would be assailant Tongue

    Gaucho
    Gaucho (e2 Member)
    10
    969 forum postsGaucho vcard France2 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 4:57 PM
    0

    @ Strawman. So the Olympus may not only look better but "sound" better as well? Tongue

    strawman
    7 Apr 2011 - 5:18 PM
    0

    Very true. and if you think the camera is good looking and you throw it at someone does it become.





    drum roll please







    Beauty in the eye of the beholder.



    Buy me beer I will fall asleep its better that way.

    uzi9mm
    1
    36 forum posts United Kingdom
    7 Apr 2011 - 6:03 PM
    0

    the landrover is better than lotus ive drove both lol..

    Mike Otley
    Mike Otley (e2 Member)
    8
    17325 forum postsMike Otley vcard Norway8 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 6:14 PM
    0


    Quote: Bottom line any camera is only as good as the monkey using it......

    Right on the money.

    There are examples of work on this site where the image was derived on Nikon D70's / Canon 10D's - and earlier.

    It YOU that makes the difference - NOT the camera.

    Smile

    Last Modified By Mike Otley at 7 Apr 2011 - 6:14 PM
    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
    11
    8606 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 6:52 PM
    0


    Quote: It YOU that makes the difference - NOT the camera

    Any of you remember EPZ member Michal Wilczewski, he used the most basic of kit, an e300 with kit lenses.

    He`s now here Smile

    http://www.olympus.co.uk/consumer/dslr_17451.htm

    Chris_L
    7 Apr 2011 - 7:12 PM
    0

    I wouldn't know the answer to your question as I don't use both so can't compare. Not that it will stop some from saying Nikon or Canon is better than Olympus even if they've no experience of the marque. Tongue

    In theory no - though I have not done comparison's to prove it.
    What I do know using DX and FX is that a DX lens on DX generally out performs an equivalent FX lens on FX - because it is cheaper and easier to make a high quality smaller image circle DX lens than a larger image circle FX lens.
    Olympus claim, probably accurately, because of the smaller than DX image circle, they build their lenses to a higher optical standard than Nikon and Canon.
    A separate relevant question is - is Olympus going to stay in the interchangeable DSLR market?

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
    11
    8606 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 9:04 PM
    0


    Quote: A separate relevant question is - is Olympus going to stay in the interchangeable DSLR market?

    The same questions where asked when the E1 emerged, of course they are.


    Quote: because it is cheaper and easier to make a high quality smaller image circle DX lens than a larger image circle FX lens

    Lol, I don`t believe they make either Smile

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.