Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I am looking for a mid-zoom lens to use when on holiday. I currently have the stock 18-55 and a Tamron 70-300 but want something to leave on the camera when I go away.
Anyone got experience of both lenses and which would they go for?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
I haven't any experience of the 18-135 but have an 18-105 and think its a fantastic wee lens for the money. I also think the 18-135 lacks VR.
^+1 for the 18-105
the 18-105 has the VR switch which comes in very handy at longer focal lengths. the 18-200 VRII is even better but another
£200 minimum on top of what you'll pay for a new 18-105.
I've had the 18-135 for about 6 years and have "replaced" it several times, but it always seems to find its way back onto my camera when I am wandering around (especially after my wife "stole" my 16-85). It does not have VR and I very rarely use it above 100mm - I don't like pushing lenses to their extreme - but its very sharp . Having said that I'm not convinced there is much difference between that and the 18-105 in terms of magnification at the high end - take a look at the lens comparator tool on the Nikon UK website and you will probably find the difference marginal. But if VR is important to you go for the 18-105.
The 18-105 has a plastic mount which may not be quite as robust but if you are going to leave it on the camera as a do-it-all lens that may not matter much; and it will be lighter in weight and it does have VR. I'd go for the 18-105. Alternatively look at a Tamron 18-270 or recapture the 18-65 from the boss!
Not sure if VR is that important. None of my current lenses have VR and so would I a.) notice the difference or b.) miss it if I went 18-135?
doesn't your 18-55 have VR? mine did, but then again, i only bought the camera during august last year, so maybe yours is
one of the older types?
i also owned a tamron 70-300, the DI macro jobbie (not sure if it's the same as yours?) and tbh, i struggled to use it without
a tripod, especially towards the 300mm end.
i'd still recommend the 18-105 though, at least you can turn VR off if not needed.
No my 18-55 came with my D40.
In an ideal world I would like to upgrade my body to a D7000.
Tend to use the Tamron for wildlife and have got some decent results.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Are you a Nikon owner? Check out Nikon Nation to find the latest Nikon news, reviews, discussion and photos on ePHOTOzine.
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar