Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Has anybody had any experience with or Views on the – Nikon 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 AF Zoom -- Think it was discontinued around 1999
One has caught my eye and I was going to put it on my d7000 – it’s not local to me --so I am not able to try it out.
Just a bit worried that this older lens may not have good IQ or be compatible with a newer DSLR
Thanks in advance to any replies
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
I cannot comment about the old version but I have the current AFS, G, VRII version and it really is worth the price - just over £400 new if you can stretch to that. There is slight pin cushion distortion at the longer focal lengths which is corrected by the click of a button in Lightroom.
Definitely one of Nikon's hidden gems.
I think the D7000 contains a focus motor in the body so the lens should be compatible. As the D7000 is a cropped sensor you would only be using the centre of the lens. I am using a full frame sensor on the new one with excellent results.
Probably worth it unless anyone knows different.
The D version was quite reasonable for the era, though not as good as the current VR. It was introduced in 1998.
There was also a G version, built down to a price to make "affordable kits" possible. It was introduced in 2000. It's reputation is not good though I have never used it.
Which version are you looking at?
'gotta be cheap...I sold that lens a few years ago for £50...and struggled to get that.
....far better you buy the Nikon 70-300 VR which is an excellent lens...pick these up SH for little more than £250.
...taken with the 70-300 VR
the current 70-300 VR is a gem of a lens; it produces the goods with my D7000 and D90; I bought mine s/h from an epz member and never have regretted it.
Not sure of version --- It was Grays of westminster that was selling the Lens -- not showing on website now, so it looks already sold --it was just a punt really TBH --hardly any info on the internet about the lens so i thought the forum may have some idea if it was a peach or a lemon - - the reviews and photo on the 70-300 vr looks good though -- Thanks for that-- may look at one of these.
Have to endorse what has been said above about the 70-300mm. For a (relatively) cheapo lens, it is exceptionally good.
Quote: Not sure of version --- It was Grays of westminster that was selling the Lens -- not showing on website now, so it looks already sold --it was just a punt really TBH --hardly any info on the internet about the lens so i thought the forum may have some idea if it was a peach or a lemon - - the reviews and photo on the 70-300 vr looks good though -- Thanks for that-- may look at one of these.
I looked at the 75-300 some months ago, and found mixed reports so I passed on it.
It was cosidered O.K. compared with the older 30-700mm , but nothing like the recent 70-300mm. VR.
As noted above this seems to be a much better buy, even if a bit dearer.
take a look at the 55-300 vrII since ive had it on my camera its never been off great pictures from it.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Are you a Nikon owner? Check out Nikon Nation to find the latest Nikon news, reviews, discussion and photos on ePHOTOzine.
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar