Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Quote:
The screens are different, because the intent with AF is that you only use the screen for framing, not for focussing. There are no aids like split-image, rangefinder or fresnel patches which made focussing easier.
Lets agree to disagree.
I always used plain ground grass screens for manual focus on the Olympus system.
High end current digital is similar ground glass though around 3 stops darker with less focus "bite".
Even so for about a third of my AF body work I use manual focus - without any special difficulty.
In my experience the D200 did not quite equal best 100 ISO slide film, but the D300 and later digital cameras do.
It depends what sort of pictures you take. Have a look at the EXIF data for your favourite images and see which focal length your zoom lens was set to.
[quote}
The screens are different, because the intent with AF is that you only use the screen for framing, not for focussing. There are no aids like split-image, rangefinder or fresnel patches which made focussing easier.
[/quote]
I mainly disagree. With film bodies I preferred plain matt, not split image or fresnel. Provided I had my eyesight checked regularly I had no problem with matt screens.
With modern DSLR's I continue to focus manually about one third of the time using the matt part of the screen.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.













