Nikon D2x Or Nikon D300s?

Sponsored Links

27 Jan 2013 - 5:38 PM

• Options

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Nick_Hilton

8

27 Jan 2013 - 5:43 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

Easy choice D300s

User_Removed

9

27 Jan 2013 - 5:44 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

D300s.

No question. The '300s' is a quantum leap in technology.

(I have had both the D200 and now the D300)

User_Removed

9

27 Jan 2013 - 5:58 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

(I should have added that the D200 is derived from the D2(x) in sensor-terms and the D3xx evolution is, as stated, a quantum leap if only from the switch from CCD to CMOS-based sensor technology)

VanillaPenguin (e2 Member)

1

27 Jan 2013 - 6:58 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

1

thats pretty categoric...thankyou!!!

User_Removed

3

27 Jan 2013 - 8:09 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

Nice when you get such a degree of unanimity in response to a question VP.

With good D300 bodies now selling for round about the £300 mark, you really are getting a lot of camera for the money. Unless you are going for video capture, there is not much to be gained from the "s" version.

.

KNS

3

27 Jan 2013 - 9:39 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

There are significant differences between the D300 and the S variant - if you care to look at the specs, not least of which is 7fps as opposed to 6, lower noise (slightly) and two card slots.... If you can, grab the 300s a much better option - better button layout too, but what do I know! I've used one daily since 2009 check the specs for yourself LOL.

nickthompson

5

27 Jan 2013 - 10:14 PM

• Options
  • Report Error / Abuse

0

I've got a d300 and can recommend it. However, if you can go that little bit extra, why not try the d700? Full frame and less noise at high ISOs. Might be a better bet for the venue shoots.
Nick