Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Hi everyone,
I need a lens for Nikon Dslr so I could shoot in the low light action (mainly dance performances and also lifestyle indoor portaits of kids who don't sit still a lot) without a flash.
At the moment i use a couple of fixed lenses - I have nikon 50mm f1.8 and 28mm f/2.8 but it's a hassle changing them at times; plus the 50mm is sometimes a bit too narrow angled for group shots although f/1.8 allows sharper shots. I have been thinking about Nikon's 18-200 VR for a while as a good all-rounder but heard that VR lenses are only suitable for still shots not moving subjects and the f number also changes which is not ideal as I will be needing 2.8 most of the time.
Budget-wise, need something reasonable - something like nikon's 17-55 f/2.8 is a bit over the top for me.
Any comments/ideas/tips would be much appreciated.
Many thanks in advance!
Olesya
If budget was not a consideration it would have to be the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, There is nothing that comes close to it.
That said if you need something with a bit more range, The older Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 ( non VR version ) is still a classy performer.
That said a lot will depend on what body your using....?
If using a D80 for example, Your high ISO options are less, Than if you where using a D90 or D300.
A really classy f/2.8 lens will in most cases cost more than a D90 and almost as much as a D300/300s, No matter what lens you use on a D80, You will still have to beware of noise in High ISO images.
Even something like D5000 can shoot at higher ISO figures than the D80, Yet still produce clean images.....![]()
I mention all the above dribble, Because you state " Low Light " and low light with movement/action, Sure a fast lens will help, But you may also need to " Bump " up the ISO to get faster shutter speeds.
Food for thought.....Huh!
Thanks for all the comments so far!
I use Nikon D80 (should have mentioned that at the start). My usual ISO setting for this work is 800 for stage-lit performances but I can get away with 400 with daylight indoors sometimes if lucky.
At the moment all my 3 lenses are Nikon and quality is great (although were not expensive). I wonder if i will be disappointed with any "third party" lenses. I 've read a bit about Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 and it sounded good on paper - but anyone had real life experience with it and how it compares to say, Tamron or are these really not worth it? 24-70 would actually be the ideal range for me (but £1200 - ouch!!!!). 70-200 would be too long for indoor work and I have a lovely (and cheap) Nikon 70-210 f4-5.6D which covers that range outdoors.
Thanks again and looking forward to more opinions!!!!
O.
I would go for the Nikon 50mm AFS f/1.4 G
Cracking lens and ticks all the boxes for low light shooting
Or go halfers between your two primes, and look at this
Personally, I find that the Nikkor 17-55mm is just a gem.
That 20mm is horrible wide open. the 24mm f/1.8 they also do is very good at f/1.8 and cheaper too.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.


















