Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Not so Velvia heaven

Forums > Film cameras > Not so Velvia heaven

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    Coffeyboy
    6 Apr 2006 - 10:46 AM
    0

    Hiya folks,

    I recently used a Velvia slide film in my Canon 1N but when I took it to Jessops for processing I got it back all red and the assistant said it was developed like negative film instead.

    The manager than stepped in and tried to say it was my fault for not saying what type of film it was despite being inscribed on its side and also some people like the 'red' effect.

    Safe to say I won't be using Jessops for developing again lol but the bottom line is I have a damaged film and does anyone know of a way to restore it?

    I'm grateful for any help.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    6 Apr 2006 - 10:46 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    FrankThomas
    FrankThomas (e2 Member)
    10
    2759 forum postsFrankThomas vcard United Kingdom
    6 Apr 2006 - 10:50 AM
    0

    You might be able to salvage it. Sounds like the pillocks have cross processed it so you have, in effect, a negative. Try scanning it and then inverting in the photo editor of your choice. The colours will be a bit weird and the contrast will probably be a bit severe

    mlewis
    8
    1458 forum posts United Kingdom
    6 Apr 2006 - 11:08 AM
    0

    The manager saying it was your fault!? What an idiot. The monkey you handed the film to should know the difference between slide and negative film, colur and B&W etc. As for saying some people like the red effect, I would be mighty pissed off getting that effect without asking for it.

    u08mcb
    9
    5817 forum posts
    6 Apr 2006 - 11:13 AM
    0

    quite so.

    tepot
    8
    4416 forum posts United Kingdom
    6 Apr 2006 - 11:25 AM
    0

    if it's not too severe, you MIGHT be able to reduce the red in an imaging program?

    Superfly
    6 Apr 2006 - 11:50 AM
    0

    Did you not mention its a slide film when handing it over? Its not actually that difficult to mistaken a silde film as a print film (green canister in both cases).
    And when they process 100s of films everyweek, you bound to get a few mistakes.
    Mention the film as slide film next time is the only safe way.

    ps. many people do like cross-processing effect

    Sorry superfly but that's so wrong. I used to work in a camera lab, first rule when accepting a film is you look at the film cannister and tick which process it requires. If it gets processed incorrectly it is the fault of the lab not the customer.

    Yes mistakes happen, but then when they happen like the poster said, they are a mistake on the part of the lab.

    Coffeyboy, hope you got a refund or didn't pay for it.

    tepot
    8
    4416 forum posts United Kingdom
    6 Apr 2006 - 12:04 PM
    0

    Joe you are wong on that, it is the labs responsibility and i hope coffeyboy got some form of compensation.

    Its got Velvia written on the can and 'process E-6'.
    It is best to point this out to Jessops staff in case you get an untrained newbie, but if the manager can't see what is wrong, I wouldn't go there again.

    elikag
    8
    749 forum posts
    6 Apr 2006 - 8:47 PM
    0

    The place where I process my film is quite professional, nevertheless, when I hand E-6 for process I ask for a red marker and write 'SLIDES' on top of the envelope.

    Just in case....

    Ilia Kagan.

    Crass incompetance. Trouble is the best compensation you can expect is a free film.

    Henchard
    7 Apr 2006 - 12:35 AM
    0


    Quote: Trouble is the best compensation you can expect is a free film.

    This may well be true in practice. However, I recall a case quite a few years back about film processing when someone did challenge the claim that they (the processors)were only responsible for the replacement cost of materials and won.

    A trader cannot unreasonably exclude his responsibility by unfair contract clauses under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

    see here

    In this case it would seem that the processor is clearly negligent and if you really pushed it and threatened court action I suspect they would make an offer of compensation rather than incur costs and bad publicity. Whether its worth it to you is another matter.

    Coffeyboy
    7 Apr 2006 - 2:45 AM
    0

    Thanks for everyone's advice.

    As it turns out I got a refund and a replacement film but I'd still like to rescue my pics. Going to go and try a mate's film scanner and see how I get on Wink

    matt5791
    7 Apr 2006 - 2:31 PM
    0


    Quote: Trouble is the best compensation you can expect is a free film.

    Actually in these circumstances it is gross negligence on the part of Jessops - as it says process E6 and Velvia on the can. If it was something important they would be liable over and above the standard replacement of material, which is the standard.

    Personally this is a shocking story - but all is not lost. I have a cross processed shot on my portfolio on this site - have a look to see which one stands out as a little different!

    Matt

    Another shocking story of Jessops inability to do what their paid for...

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.