Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Olympus OM-D E-M1 Discussion


Carabosse e2
11 39.7k 269 England
7 Jan 2014 1:14AM
Sounds good Brian. Pity it's such a pricey bit of kit... but there again it is described as a 'Pro' lens, so presumably comparable to Canon's 'L' efforts.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

brian1208 e2
11 10.6k 12 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 1:19AM
looking at some of the images after minimal PP they are better than those I was getting with my 24-105 LIS on the 5Dmk2 (only a sample of one for each case of course, so no conclusions can be drawn, but I'm convinced its a stellar performer in the studio at least )
brian1208 e2
11 10.6k 12 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 1:33AM
Just for fun, a couple of grabs from the 600+ shots

first a crop of Hannah singing

studio-hannah-singing-crop.jpg



then a frame from a silly few moments at the end when they let their hair down and went for a bust up

studio---bust-up-in-the-band.jpg



It was one of the most fun sessions I've shot and the girls basically took over with a little direction from me
Paul Morgan e2
13 16.1k 6 England
7 Jan 2014 4:17AM

Quote:Sounds good Brian. Pity it's such a pricey bit of kit... but there again it is described as a 'Pro' lens, so presumably comparable to Canon's 'L' efforts.


You could always pick up a 14-54(both versions) or 12-60mm, there pro grade lenses as well, but you will need an adapter Smile
rogerfry e2
9 525 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 9:03AM
Definitely a "must have" lens Brian,....(makes the wait for the 40-150 even more frustrating Tongue)

Nice images from your session last night......be interesting to know the lighting set-up used for the group shot.
brian1208 e2
11 10.6k 12 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 10:03AM
Thanks Roger, I'm just ploughing though all 600+ images putting together Hannah's portfolio so she can have it before she returns to uni on Saturday (she's the singer and is in her 2nd year of a degree relating to performance and art, so is a natural for this type of shoot)

The other lass is a professional entertainer and spends a lot of time working with schools and stage groups and is wonderfully uninhibited in the studio, she helped bring three people who had never worked together in front of the camera into a cohesive group and we all had a ball shooting this sessionSmile

The lighting was based on a stage lighting suggestion I saw recently, two high level gridded flash heads with barn doors, aimed down at the singers from each side and two low level square soft boxes (about a foot off the floor), aiming slightly upward and inward from the edges of the studio

We used a large U shaped curtain to provide the "stage" backdrop and the black vinyl drop screen for the floor

The more I look at this series the more convinced I am that this lens is well worth the money
brian1208 e2
11 10.6k 12 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 10:09AM
Here are a few more from the session

(as you can see, a fair bit of clowning about went on Grin


hannah--1-17.jpg



hannah--1-11.jpg



hannah--1-27.jpg

rogerfry e2
9 525 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 10:25AM
Thanks for the info Brian........and more great images Smile
Carabosse e2
11 39.7k 269 England
7 Jan 2014 4:32PM
Very unsure as to whether to move over to the E-M1. I've read comparisons, e.g. here and here . A harder decision than ditching my Canon full-frame equipment and going over to M4/3!

Any thoughts appreciated. Smile
brian1208 e2
11 10.6k 12 United Kingdom
7 Jan 2014 5:00PM
My thoughts CB, for what they are worth, having got both cameras:

- unless you need the larger / brighter EVF + the ability to shoot up to 1/8000th sec + the ability to use 4/3rds lens with adequate CAF (and much improved CAF with m4/3rds lenses) stick with the EM-5

There is little if any improvement in IQ (although the "ISO100" does help in some situations) and I reckon around +1 stop on noise (ISO1600 on my EM-1 + ISO800 on my EM-5)

Ergonomics are improved but I don't remember you ever complaining about the EM-5?

Spend the money on the pro lenses that are here / coming would be my suggestion for your style of shooting
The quality of the images from this kit is impressive. The separation of the blacks from the background and the rendering of the highlights shows an excellent range.

Your lighting is very good as well. I really like to see the fun elements from shoots as well as the "Selected" shots.

Nicely done.
Paul_Anthony e2
2 386 4 Wales
7 Jan 2014 7:07PM
Quite a few pros are moving to CSC's ... here
Paul Morgan e2
13 16.1k 6 England
7 Jan 2014 7:15PM
None are well known though Smile
Paul_Anthony e2
2 386 4 Wales
7 Jan 2014 7:18PM
How many professionals are well known? There are thousands of pro togs in the Uk I have never heard of... Smile

edit: and I doubt they have ever heard of me either... Smile
Paul Morgan e2
13 16.1k 6 England
7 Jan 2014 7:23PM
Very true Smile

I`ve read of a fair few wedding photographers shooting with the EM5 or Fuji x100/x100s.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.