Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Olympus OM-D EM-5 Discussion

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
mdpontin
mdpontin  106016 forum posts Scotland
17 Nov 2012 - 10:24 PM


Quote: I get your point about candids, but they're not my sort of thing, or people of any kind for that matter. I have an uncanny ability to make a supermodel look like a relative of Quasimodo, so gave up on portraits (other than my son) a while ago.

I can recognise talent when I see it. I only ever take (family) people pictures if compelled, and I've never graduated beyond convict mug-shot level. Wink

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
17 Nov 2012 - 10:24 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Carabosse
Carabosse e2 Member 1139395 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
17 Nov 2012 - 10:55 PM

I like taking true candids, i.e. where the subject is completely unaware of your activity. Wink

But this is mainly for the challenge of it. My efforts are rarely worth sharing. The tilt-screen of the E-M5 is useful as you can use the camera at waist level. But I'd use a more discreet device in preference.

Whilst I really like the idea of the Oly 45/f1.8, I'm not sure I'd use it much. The Oly 60mm macro is such a great all-purpose lens that the need is just not there. It would be different if I did studio stuff, I guess.

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
17 Nov 2012 - 10:57 PM

Your 60mm makes for a fine studio lens CB.

Carabosse
Carabosse e2 Member 1139395 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
17 Nov 2012 - 11:03 PM

I sometimes have slight doubts about the 60 macro's focusing on distant subjects..... speed and accuracy. But it's probably just me forgetting to set the focus dial properly! Lol! Wink

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
17 Nov 2012 - 11:10 PM

I found similar things using the 45, the focus can be too sensitive at times, I tried to focus on the bottom of the garden through a glass window.

The lens kept focusing on the glass and nothing else, turned out the glass was not as clean as I thought it was and the lens was focusing on a small speck of grime Smile

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
17 Nov 2012 - 11:48 PM

Its often claimed that M4/3 lenses are more expensive than the equ dslr lenses, think again.

This is x3 the price of the equ M4/3 lens Smile

http://www.ephotozine.com/article/canon-ef-24-70mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm-lens-review-205...

rogerfry
rogerfry e2 Member 8506 forum postsrogerfry vcard United Kingdom
18 Nov 2012 - 12:06 AM

this is the equivalent of the 12-50, but it does have a constant aperture of f4 which equates to f2 on the 12-50. Smile

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
18 Nov 2012 - 2:04 AM

Should have said what was the equ of that Canon, the Pany 12-35.

Guess this is the equ of the Pany 35-100

http://www.wexphotographic.com/buy-canon-ef-70-200mm-f2-8-l-is-ii-usm-lens/p1518...

rogerfry
rogerfry e2 Member 8506 forum postsrogerfry vcard United Kingdom
18 Nov 2012 - 2:26 PM

Both those Panasonics have got great reviews Paul.....but Father Christmas says he's on an economy drive this year. Sad

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
18 Nov 2012 - 5:22 PM

Yeh I wouldn`t mind the 12-35 myself Smile

User_Removed
18 Nov 2012 - 6:12 PM


Quote: 12-35

Ooooh...!!!

Despite my comment in our earlier PM Paul - I could be interested in that!


Wink

Last Modified By User_Removed at 18 Nov 2012 - 6:12 PM
Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
18 Nov 2012 - 6:26 PM

And its only about 1/3 of the price of the Canon version, now who said M4/3 was dearer Smile

Carabosse
Carabosse e2 Member 1139395 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
18 Nov 2012 - 7:42 PM

The Mk II version of the Canon 24-70mm seems grossly overpriced. The Mk I was around 900, I think, before it was superseded.

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1315219 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
18 Nov 2012 - 8:40 PM

I`ve got a feeling the price is already dropping, it was shown at 2300, one heck of a lot.

Carabosse
Carabosse e2 Member 1139395 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
19 Nov 2012 - 2:23 AM

Apparently there's a book on the E-M5 coming out, just after Christmas. I wonder if it will add to our knowledge of this camera at all? Smile

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.