0

On a horse

Forums > Accessories > On a horse

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:05 AM
    0

    Hello all,

    Later this year I will be in the USA taking in the delights of Wyoming. Much of that time will be spent mounted on a horse (it being the main form of transport that I will be using). With that in mind it seems likely that I will need an equipment bag of some sort that will lend itself well to that mode of transport. I'm thinking that some kind of backpack which is not too large (I will be wearing it sitting down) might be the best approach. Anyone have any recommendations? It would be great if it has some kind of tripod carrying capabilities too but I realise that this might be asking too much.

    Cheers!

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:05 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    zoo9753
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:20 AM
    0

    Hi when I'm out and about I use a Lowepro Micro Trekker 200 which has straps for a small tripod. I carry 3 lens in in (kit 18-55, 70-200 L and 100 f/2.8 macro) it could probably take one more + accessories. Its really well padded so quite hardy and also it comfortable to wear as its quite compact. I think the list price is about £70 but you can get it for £50 online - personally I recommend A J Purdy, they deliver free and you get it the next day. Hoep that is some help to you. I am v jealous of the trip you have planned!
    Lynn

    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:34 AM
    0

    Thanks Lynn, I'll take a look. this LowePro Slingshot looks interesting. No tripod though but I'm tempted by the quick access.

    zoo9753
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:39 AM
    0

    Yeah, that looks like just the job. The 200 might be a bit awkward if you are using it on the move. You don't want your camera falling out and getting trodden on!

    MeanGreeny
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:45 AM
    0

    How much gear are you going to carry ?

    If it is 1 body and 3 lenses plus some odds and ends e.g. spare battery and media cards, then there will be enough spare space in the Slingshot for a few extra personal items. Whether it is suitable for all day on a horse with the strap being over only one shoulder I could not guess - depends on the weight you intend to haul.

    I guess 1 body & 1-2 lenses would be fine............ more than that ? I don't know.

    I have the Slingshot 200 and as a backpack for a 'reduced gear' day it is great.

    conrad
    conrad (e2 Member)
    7
    10570 forum postsconrad vcard Netherlands112 Constructive Critique Points
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:45 AM
    0

    I use the Slingshot 200. It's handy because you can use it without taking it off completely.

    But: it's only handy without taking it off when using the lens that's on the camera at the time. If you need to change lenses while on the horse, it's suddenly not so handy anymore.

    Also, you can't have a very big beast of a lens on your camera in this bag, you'd have to take it off. My 28-220 lens is about the maximum, but a Canon 70-200 L would have to be taken off the camera.

    Conrad

    BOB S
    9
    2621 forum posts
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:49 AM
    0

    Maybe you could leave the rifle at the ranch and put your tripod in its holder Wink

    BOB

    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:54 AM
    0

    Haha Bob, interesting thought. As for the amount of equipment it will be very small. 3 lenses top with one of those on the D70. Largest lens 105mm sigma. Spare battery, remote, cleaning stuff, lens hood or two, flash cards + if possible a SB600 flash.

    MeanGreeny
    30 Jun 2006 - 9:54 AM
    0

    The Sigma 70-200 f2.8 fits into a Slingshot 200 if the internal padding is rearranged to allow it to fit in crosswise. This allows at least 1 more lens though, plus bits & pieces.

    The Canon version is 13mm longer [same diameter] and - I would guess - just beyond the Slingshot 200's capabilities since the Sigma is a comfortable but snug fit.

    Take you gear into a shop and test that they'll fit. It's the only way to be sure

    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 10:23 AM
    0

    My main concern about the slingshot is any tendancy that the bag will have to swing round on a bumpy ride. Mrs. is quite concerned about this too. Might have to consider a "proper" two sling backpack of some kind.

    conrad
    conrad (e2 Member)
    7
    10570 forum postsconrad vcard Netherlands112 Constructive Critique Points
    30 Jun 2006 - 10:29 AM
    0

    I don't know if you've ever seen a Slingshot in real life, or even tried it out, but the fact that you can swing it round on your shoulder does NOT mean that it's only held in place with one sling. It has two slings, only not attached in the usual way. When you want to use the bag, you open the clip on the narrow sling, and swing the bag round on your shoulder using the wide sling. I don't see the problem.

    C.

    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 10:42 AM
    0

    Interesting conrad, that I was not aware of. And no, I have not seen the bag. These days most of the things I buy are sight unseen. That's one of the reasons why I find forums like this so useful.

    Cheers for the info.

    keith selmes
    30 Jun 2006 - 11:41 AM
    0

    Myself, I'd try what I usually do on foot.
    Lenses and accessories go in pouches on a B&Q leather belt, lunchbag with any waterpfoofs/camera extras/maps goes over one shoulder bandolier fashion and the camera goes over the other side also bandolier fashion, probably with a lens fitted. Everything is to hand all the time.
    When I say 'try', I'd try it on a horse for an hour or two before going to Wyoming. That applies to any option.
    In Wyoming, I guess it'll be a stock saddle of some kind, the tripod should tie on somewhere, main thing is to have it padded or something so it can't hurt the horse.
    An equivalent to a rifle holster is a nice idea.

    And in Wyoming I think you won't be 'sitting down', you'll be Riding Tall In The Saddle!

    JohnJo
    6
    145 forum posts United Kingdom
    30 Jun 2006 - 12:51 PM
    0

    Ummm, I hadn't actually considered this before but riding a horse is easy right? You just sit on it and point, yes?

    strawman
    30 Jun 2006 - 12:52 PM
    0

    I never know where to put the keys.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.