0

Photoshop elements 8 to 9

Forums > Computers > Photoshop elements 8 to 9

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last
    Hunky
    1
    21 May 2011 - 5:15 PM
    0

    Hi I have photoshop elements 8 and as I have a new camera Canon 600d I have been told that if I update to 9 I will be able to see my photo's and not have to use a dng ..this being the case how can I update without having to pay the full price etc..don't mind paying but can't see the point of paying in full for the little changes it delivers..any advice...

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    21 May 2011 - 5:15 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    mrcal
    8
    1011 forum posts
    21 May 2011 - 6:03 PM
    0

    You could save yourself the money and use the DPP software that comes with your camera. This can interpret all of Canon's RAW files and output as TIf or JPG for further editing.

    paperboy
    21 May 2011 - 6:07 PM
    0

    64 pounds to uograde Adobe.com....probably much less if you look around i.e. Amazon.com $74.00 us. Why not use your Canon software and then import to elements.

    Hunky
    1
    21 May 2011 - 6:09 PM
    0

    Thanx mrcal

    BigRick
    21 May 2011 - 9:50 PM
    0


    Quote: You could save yourself the money and use the DPP software that comes with your camera. This can interpret all of Canon's RAW files and output as TIf or JPG for further editing.

    why would you do that....?? surely RAW editing is the way to go..... just buy the upgrade for elements.

    tomcat606
    tomcat606 (e2 Member)
    2
    81 forum poststomcat606 vcard
    22 May 2011 - 1:02 PM
    0

    Can you edit RAW files with the new ADOBE PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS 9 & ADOBE PREMIERE ELEMENTS 9 PLUS

    Thank SteveWink

    mikehit
    mikehit (e2 Member)
    2
    2153 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
    22 May 2011 - 2:25 PM
    0

    Yes - it comes with the latest version of RAW (v6.4?) which can decypher the 600D files. The box set comes as two discs, one with PSE and one with Premiere Elements.

    tomcat606
    tomcat606 (e2 Member)
    2
    81 forum poststomcat606 vcard
    22 May 2011 - 3:06 PM
    0

    thank you Wink

    Graywolf
    22 May 2011 - 6:29 PM
    0


    Quote: You could save yourself the money and use the DPP software that comes with your camera. This can interpret all of Canon's RAW files and output as TIf or JPG for further editing.

    why would you do that....?? surely RAW editing is the way to go..... just buy the upgrade for elements.

    ???

    BigRick
    22 May 2011 - 6:35 PM
    0


    Quote: You could save yourself the money and use the DPP software that comes with your camera. This can interpret all of Canon's RAW files and output as TIf or JPG for further editing.

    why would you do that....?? surely RAW editing is the way to go..... just buy the upgrade for elements.

    ???

    ??? what?

    keithh
    8
    20891 forum posts Wallis and Futuna6 Constructive Critique Points
    23 May 2011 - 2:50 PM
    0

    He means that Canon's DPP software IS a raw convertor.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    23 May 2011 - 2:59 PM
    0


    Quote: it comes with the latest version of RAW (v6.4?)

    What is meant here is "Adobe Camera RAW v6.4" - which is also a RAW converter - but it is integrated with Photoshop, so can jump straight from one to the other.

    BigRick
    23 May 2011 - 10:45 PM
    0


    Quote: He means that Canon's DPP software IS a raw convertor.

    i get that, but to convert a RAW file, and then edit a jpeg seems a waste of time, or am i missing something.... i thought the point of PS RAW was that it opened the RAW file, to make contrast, and saturation, or exposure etc adjustments, then you opened the RAW file into PS for further editing. If i wanted to edit a jpeg, i would just take the photo as a jpeg in the first place?

    strawman
    24 May 2011 - 12:07 AM
    0

    Why go JPEG and I think you are missing a step. All the RAW converters, including Adobe Camera RAW convert into another file format. Myself I would advise 16 bit TIFF to maintain maximum detail. If it has opened in the main photoshop editor a converted file has been created and you will need to save it or you will loose edits.

    So if you use DPP you can set it to create a 16 bit TIFF file and when it has performed the conversion it will open Photoshop with that file ready for further editing (if you configure it that way you set up the RAW conversion settings then hit the process button and Photoshop opens with the converted file, no extra key presses). Your photoshop experience is no different as both go through a RAW to image in Photoshop editor phase. So with DPP you get the advantage you do not need to keep on paying Adobe for upgrades, you can keep your older copy and with DPP you get a free RAW converter that is updated and enhanced. Plus DPP does much better at lens correction etc in the RAW file, handy if you have compact camera that shoots RAW. Plus DPP has better file sorting and preview functions plus a better batching option if you have a lot of files to process.

    Have a play, you may find it better than what ships with the latest copy of Elements. And for the OP, it saves money and is the better solution, win all round.

    Last Modified By strawman at 24 May 2011 - 12:09 AM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    24 May 2011 - 1:35 AM
    0

    If you use Adobe Camera RAW you make as many adjustments as you wish and then you have the option of saving it (it's wise to save as 16-bit TIFF, as has been said) and opening it in Photoshop. Or you can open right away in Photoshop and continue to fine-tune the image. You can then save as a TIFF from Photoshop or just save as a JPEG once you have finished adjustments, skipping TIFF. (But the latter is not a good idea.)

    What you certainly don't do is save a JPEG and then continue with adjustments. Saving as JPEG should always be the very LAST step.

    Hope that clarifies. Smile

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.