0

Polariser Lens filter

Forums > Digital cameras > Polariser Lens filter

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last
    hecmac
    hecmac (e2 Member)
    8
    60 forum postshecmac vcard United Kingdom
    30 Jul 2004 - 9:54 PM
    0

    Hello all,

    After reading through some photography books I purchased a polariser lens cap for my 70-300 mm lens.

    Nice sunny day down the beach so I took some shots of my girlfriend (clothed!!) with and without the cap.

    Oh what a difference to the photos, maybe I am imaging this but the shots with the polariser were bright colourful, accurate and seemed very sharp. I am so pleased with the small run I had with it.

    Just wanted to share this experience and see if anybody else has these results

    (photos not posted because my GF would shoot me!! )

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    30 Jul 2004 - 9:54 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    deviant
    30 Jul 2004 - 9:58 PM
    0

    Yeah thats what polarizers do best. Saturate colour and remove a bit of glare. Glad you had a good time with it.

    josspowick
    31 Jul 2004 - 9:44 AM
    0

    Ive got one in the post, winging its way to me shortly.....cant wait. Happy snapping!

    stusteve1
    31 Jul 2004 - 8:36 PM
    0

    Definitely the most useful filter to have. As long as you remember to rotate it! The salesman always tries to flog you a UV or skylight filter which is next to useless. Just get more internal reflections!

    Miles Herbert
    Miles Herbert (e2 Member)
    9
    1792 forum postsMiles Herbert vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
    31 Jul 2004 - 8:53 PM
    0

    Remember that when using a polariser you lose about 1.5 to 2 stops of light going through the lens, making for slower shutter speeds/larger apertures to compensate.

    keithh
    8
    20891 forum posts Wallis and Futuna6 Constructive Critique Points
    31 Jul 2004 - 10:45 PM
    0

    First time I've heard a UV filter described as useless...LOL

    snapbandit
    snapbandit (e2 Member)
    8
    2073 forum postssnapbandit vcard Northern Ireland1 Constructive Critique Points
    31 Jul 2004 - 10:50 PM
    0

    The number of times a UV or skylight filter has saved my lens from flying dust/debris, I find it far from useless. I know many will say don't use filters only for protection, but I do and will continue to. I would rather replace a 20 filter than a hundreds lens!

    My 2p

    Joe B

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Aug 2004 - 12:51 AM
    0

    I will not use a camera (stills or video) without a UV filter. But get a decent quality one - I have B+W filters on my cameras.

    stusteve1
    1 Aug 2004 - 9:19 PM
    0

    Very constructive keithh ... "LOL" indeed.

    agoreira
    1 Aug 2004 - 9:25 PM
    0

    "First time I've heard a UV filter described as useless."

    Bloody glad I had one on my 100-400 lens yesterday when I dropped it! UV filter was smashed to bits, lens underneath was intact. I sure it if wasn't there, I'd be looking at spending 1,300 for a replacement. Plenty enough good reason for me to fit another as soon as I can.

    Frank

    Just Jas
    1 Aug 2004 - 9:33 PM
    0

    A UV filter cuts out UV (within its bandwidth) and dust etc on the lens.

    The idea is to produce clearer pictures not to add effects.

    jas

    Miles Herbert
    Miles Herbert (e2 Member)
    9
    1792 forum postsMiles Herbert vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Aug 2004 - 10:12 PM
    0

    Walked through a gate once with camera hanging round my neck, the latch caught the front element of the lens...wish I'd had one of those useless UV filters on the lens that day. Now, since then, every lens I have ALWAYS has a UV filter on the front unless I'm using Lee Filters at very wide angles, in which case the lee filter gives the protection.

    strawman
    1 Aug 2004 - 10:20 PM
    0

    Yup I have bounced too many lenses to not have a UV one on the front.

    Took my camera out skating in Nottingham a while back. On a particularly fast corner I decided to use the lens to break my fall. UV filter smashed, lens fine. Had to wait until I got home and had to use pliers to remove it.

    I generally leave a polariser on the front these days, unless the light is failing or I'm using a convertor. It helps to reduce/emphasise reflections and bring out colours under sunlight. I lost one somehow, so had to go out and buy a replacement as I realised very quickly how much I missed it when I didn't have it.

    hecmac
    hecmac (e2 Member)
    8
    60 forum postshecmac vcard United Kingdom
    2 Aug 2004 - 10:22 PM
    0

    Whats the reason behind turning the polariser lens??

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.