Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Product photography

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    cmawson
    cmawson  11271 forum posts United Kingdom
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:00 PM

    A question has been put to me by one of my wife's friends.

    If one was to take a photograph of a named product, e.g. Apple, Samsung, etc, is permission required from the manufacturer/trademark holder in order to sell the photo for gain, for example for stock photography?

    Chris

    Last Modified By cmawson at 8 Oct 2012 - 6:01 PM
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:00 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    User_Removed
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:25 PM

    If their logo or other trademarks constitute a significant part of the image then it can be an infringement. In a lot of stock photos of people with phones, laptops etc the gadgets look generic or are just one small part of the picture and that's why.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    cmawson
    cmawson  11271 forum posts United Kingdom
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:28 PM

    Thanks Chris, what if the name, logo, & product constitutes the main bulk of the picture? I take it that would be infringement.

    Last Modified By cmawson at 8 Oct 2012 - 6:36 PM
    lemmy
    lemmy  71812 forum posts United Kingdom
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:29 PM

    Micro-stock agencies won't accept anything with a logo showing.

    Alamy will accept such pictures provided the device is not the point of the picture. For example, a model laughing with friends and holding an iPhone to her ear would be fine for editorial use. It would not be OK for commercial use and you would require a release. I have sold pix featuring my iPad hitched up to a DSLR. No problem for editorial use but for commercial use, say an ad or a poster, it's no.

    The whole area is a bit fuzzy but agencies will always err on the side of caution. In general, don't show logos.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    cmawson
    cmawson  11271 forum posts United Kingdom
    8 Oct 2012 - 6:41 PM

    Ok, Chris & Lemmy many thanks for your help on this, very much appreciated.

    lemmy
    lemmy  71812 forum posts United Kingdom
    8 Oct 2012 - 8:34 PM

    Sorry Chris_L I must have been writing my post while your post was appearing. I had nothing to add to yours but hadn't seen it at before I posted.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse e2 Member 1139395 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Oct 2012 - 9:04 PM

    Largely to echo what has already been said. Some stock libraries are very fussy. If at all possible, i.e. without ruining the photo, carefully remove any manufacturer logos/badges and you shouldn't have any issues.

    "If in doubt leave it out!" Smile

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.