Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Replacement for D300


26 Feb 2014 4:29PM
Where oh where is the Nikon replacement for the D300 [DX] bodied camera? I have been wanted to replace/upgrade for a couple of years BUT Nikon just aren't providing. Sure there have been some new FX bodied cameras and a few lower priced DX bodies BUT nothing nothing nothing to replace.
ANYONE else got the same problem? I have an array of lenses BUT all of which would have to be replaced if I moved on up to an FX Nikon.....let alone the cost of it all.
Love to hear from anyone with suggestions - polite ones of course!
Thanks

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

discreetphoton e2
10 3.5k 20 United Kingdom
26 Feb 2014 4:40PM
I gave up waiting and bought a D800. It's the only FX camera which will still provide an upgrade to your current setup using your existing lenses.
Treat it as a phased upgrade. Camera first (ISO and dynamic range upgrades, and adds video), and work on the lenses later.
You may not want to do this, but it is an option and it's how I did it.
I used to own a 50mm 1.8, but I sold it because it never got any use. Thanks to the difference in viewing angle on an FX body, the F1.4 was the first one I bought when I picked up the D800, and I use it all the time.
26 Feb 2014 4:47PM
That's really useful to know thanks so much.
I'd appreciate anyone else's thoughts too.
Grin
daibev e2
10 50 Wales
26 Feb 2014 4:47PM
D7100 would be the one I would go for at the moment. The quality is fantastic as it lacks the low pass filter and is 24MP. Handling and build quality is also very good. This is what I moved to from my D300s for wildlife shots.
Andy80F 11 311 United Kingdom
26 Feb 2014 5:35PM
In the D610 not the natural replacement? Getting great reviews. However I'd back the D7100 to which I have just moved and it is a brilliant body, is weather proofed and has some grown up features (at least in comparison to my old D80).
26 Feb 2014 7:52PM
The D71000 gives you about 25% more image resolution, more dynamic range, much better noise, better AF and if you shoot 14 bit out performs the D300.
It may not be an exact replacement for a D300 but overall has much better performance.
richmowil e2
5 279 1 England
26 Feb 2014 10:58PM

Quote:D7100 would be the one I would go for at the moment. The quality is fantastic as it lacks the low pass filter and is 24MP. Handling and build quality is also very good. This is what I moved to from my D300s for wildlife shots.


I did exactly the same - Results are very good.
discreetphoton e2
10 3.5k 20 United Kingdom
27 Feb 2014 8:25AM

Quote:In the D610 not the natural replacement?

No, the absence of a few key features and controls means that the flexibility and user experience of the D7100/ D610 cannot match the D300, although they exceed it in other areas.
The D7100 gets you close without doubling your cash output. I wouldn't consider the 610 without the ability to replace the lenses at the same time.
Chant57 e2
8 391 3 United Kingdom
27 Feb 2014 9:19AM
I'm in the same situation as the OP. I have the D300s and have patiently been waiting for its successor. The D300s , as far as I'm aware, is the only DX body that Nikon acknowledge as being in their Pro range. We have seen a lot of new FX bodies from them recently, I'm disappointed that they don't seem to be looking to develop their DX pro body range with as much gusto.
discreetphoton e2
10 3.5k 20 United Kingdom
27 Feb 2014 10:28AM
That's a good point actually. My move to the D800 was partially influenced by my wish to retain my Nikon Pro User membership.
keithh e2
11 23.4k 33 Wallis And Futuna
27 Feb 2014 12:29PM
It is a bit silly really that Nikon include the 800 in their list of allowed cameras for their Pro Membership, yet it is not built any better than the 7100.
discreetphoton e2
10 3.5k 20 United Kingdom
27 Feb 2014 1:14PM
Admittedly, the 300 felt more robust.
ChrisJD e2
4 96 Scotland
27 Feb 2014 1:36PM
I gave up waiting as well but bought a second hand D4. I found the D7100 buffer to be too easily choked - if it were a larger buffer I'd have bought it.
JohnParminter 7 1.3k 14 England
27 Feb 2014 1:38PM

Quote:It is a bit silly really that Nikon include the 800 in their list of allowed cameras for their Pro Membership


But as you know Keith, Pros are only interested in pixel count........ Wink

so it makes perfect sense...

Smile
thewilliam 6 4.9k
27 Feb 2014 2:30PM
One colleague bought a couple of D800 bodies and uses DX lenses because they "auto-crop" down to the smaller frame size, when she wants a lower pixel count. 18 Megapixel is fine for a lot of portrait or baby work.

Few professionals "need" the ruggedness of the single-digit bodies. My oldest D3 is still close to pristine after 6 years of professional use in a portrait studio. Only the wear to the rubber covers or the actuation count give an indication of the amount of use.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.