Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

rule of thirds?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    HuntedDragon
    22 Jan 2011 - 2:30 AM

    oh phi to it....

    http://goldennumber.net/

    and of beauty?...........oh phi to it.

    http://www.beautyanalysis.com/index2_mba.htm

    life the universe and everything? ..oh phi to it lol......... if its all true then it seems we ALL fit into the latice of the universe, but the proof you may ask? the proof is your here...so photogragh it lol.

    Last Modified By HuntedDragon at 22 Jan 2011 - 2:32 AM
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    22 Jan 2011 - 2:30 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    HuntedDragon
    22 Jan 2011 - 2:36 AM

    are we conforming to a shape, ok the universe shape? why cant we move inbetween these lines, these rules?

    i think we can and we do, so the images are usualy a little off a perfect pentagon....owch goes the church.


    of beauty? it's a trend...so that brakes any strigent 'ruling' alowing a little off center, not to much mind. after all if we all were to afraif to not conform, we'd be stuck in a globe with corners shape, the world would stop dead.

    hmmmm....wos think?

    from a sencer to a pc veiw to a print...whats the phi for that then?



    cafine helps dunt it lol...not.

    Last Modified By HuntedDragon at 22 Jan 2011 - 2:39 AM
    Cephus
    Cephus  92100 forum posts England
    22 Jan 2011 - 10:32 AM


    Quote: Were you on something last night?

    Or now??

    Alan_Warriner
    22 Jan 2011 - 11:54 AM

    Omega is the number Ω

    Picture_Newport
    22 Jan 2011 - 11:58 AM

    Bonkers Grin !!! Grin

    Jestertheclown
    22 Jan 2011 - 11:58 AM


    Quote: Were you on something last night?

    Can we all have some . . . ?

    although, on second thoughts . . .

    HuntedDragon
    22 Jan 2011 - 12:07 PM

    hahaha, the rule of thirds is phi, prounsed 'fee' if you take the greek. its looking like a mathamatical number that ties into the structure of the universe. it also ties in to the beauty feature relasionships etc etc..

    phi...


    one of the google nights...no drugs required lol.

    Last Modified By HuntedDragon at 22 Jan 2011 - 12:08 PM
    joolsb
    joolsb e2 Member 927107 forum postsjoolsb vcard Switzerland38 Constructive Critique Points
    22 Jan 2011 - 3:56 PM


    Quote: its looking like a mathamatical number that ties into the structure of the universe.

    Now that's a bit of a stretch. How, exactly?

    I can accept that the RoT is an approximation of the Golden Mean which itself is based on the Fibonacci Sequence. I can even accept that the FS is found throughout nature (it turns out to be one of the most space-efficient ways of organising a collection of items). But I find it hard to accept that a ratio that is said to govern what we humans find to be attractive is actually part of the 'structure of the universe', whatever that may be.

    Overread
    Overread  53745 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
    22 Jan 2011 - 4:01 PM

    Meh the problem is that we view the structure of the universe with a very limited eye - thus its no surprise that if we find laws and common themes within Earths structure that we would also see them at the far larger universal scale. However we have such a tiny view of it all that I think its partly wishful thinking on the scientists side to sound like they know a lot more than they actually do Tongue

    bigalguitarpicker


    Quote: Hahaha, the rule of thirds is phi, prounsed 'fee' if you take the greek. its looking like a mathamatical number that ties into the structure of the universe. it also ties in to the beauty feature relasionships etc etc..

    phi...


    one of the google nights...no drugs required lol.

    So I've been wrong for 50 years thinking it's pronounced "Fie"?

    Paintman
    Paintman e2 Member 7789 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom171 Constructive Critique Points
    22 Jan 2011 - 8:51 PM

    Everyone knows the answer to life, the universe and everything is 42, not TRoTSmile

    joolsb
    joolsb e2 Member 927107 forum postsjoolsb vcard Switzerland38 Constructive Critique Points
    22 Jan 2011 - 10:15 PM


    Quote: So I've been wrong for 50 years thinking it's pronounced "Fie"?

    Phi, phi, pho, phum?

    HuntedDragon
    22 Jan 2011 - 10:30 PM

    well..i supose the pronunciation depends on weather its finite or infinate, because if its the later it dunt work out right and all them beauties are geometricaly rong, right in the middle of our universe lol.

    (the greek is fee the others just what every oneelse made of it after, but, alas..i have no concrete evidence to sugest any of it, so phi to it lolol).


    i have a theory to the meaning of life, sorry but it doesnt involve and majical destinies for the 'special' people, its as simple as...your born and alive, the meaning of life is to live as long as posable, nothing more nothing less..

    and i thought it 32?

    Last Modified By HuntedDragon at 22 Jan 2011 - 10:33 PM
    HuntedDragon
    22 Jan 2011 - 10:41 PM


    Quote: Meh the problem is that we view the structure of the universe with a very limited eye - thus its no surprise that if we find laws and common themes within Earths structure that we would also see them at the far larger universal scale. However we have such a tiny view of it all that I think its partly wishful thinking on the scientists side to sound like they know a lot more than they actually do Tongue

    if you pour a jug of marbles into a triangle snooker rack you get a pyramid shape eventualy...if you waz a loud of matter into a confined space like a universe...then maybe there is a 'building block' latice formation, limited or goverened by more than mere 3D concepts of self importance lol.. energies been classed as a solid, a solid as energy and back the other way up n round back and through.. dimentions, think were on 11 definate and 14 sort of proven.. and is our galaxy magnolia in colour or green, i forget now, but it is cloudy out.
    at the end of the day you have a 'matter' sticking to another matter by an energy, its entirely posable theres only so many 'shapes' that it can hold with in those perameters, out side the planet the gallaxy..the universe?... and perhaps even out side of a finite universe.

    so...is that 50mm or 65mm lens?

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.