0

Should i come back and use film again??

Forums > Taking photos > Should i come back and use film again??

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 | Next · Last
    simon10d
    12 Oct 2004 - 11:36 AM
    0

    I currently just sold my 10d and have a small temptation to come back to film. Any opinions? I have canon lenses and would need to buy a film scanner also.Any feedback would be appreciated.
    Simon

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    12 Oct 2004 - 11:36 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Oct 2004 - 11:40 AM
    0

    Depends on your reasons. If you have a sudden passion for "retro" why not use film?

    Also depends why you sold your 10D.

    simon10d
    12 Oct 2004 - 11:43 AM
    0

    i was going to upgrade to the 20d but the eos 3 caught my eye.When i say back to film i dont mean back as in time, just because i had an eos55 a few years ago. Simon

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Oct 2004 - 11:46 AM
    0

    I've owned two Canon 35mm SLRs and, oddly enough, don't have the slightest desire to go back to owning one. Wink

    I think a few on here have upgraded from the EOS 3 to the 20D and don't seem to regret it.

    tiptoe
    8
    267 forum posts
    12 Oct 2004 - 12:00 PM
    0

    Well -I have been without my digital camera for a month now and I've taken out my Canon EOS 600 and it's lenses, filters, et al out of storage and dusted them off.
    BUT I haven't taken a single photograph. The kit's just too much to cart around, it's heavy and a faf to keep changing the lenses over.
    Plus although I have some film in the freezer have you seen the cost of processing these days?
    After the immediacy of digital there's no fun in film (for me anyhow) anymore.
    Still the taking out and dusting off will not be in vain 'cos the minute my camera (a camera) arrives back from Fuji I'll be taking pictures and posting it all up on Ebay along with all the dark room equipment I have in the loft.
    Merlin

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Oct 2004 - 12:31 PM
    0

    But that's a different issue Merlin.

    Simon is considering "Film SLR vs. Digital SLR" so the lugging around of stuff will be much the same.

    michaeldt
    12 Oct 2004 - 12:37 PM
    0

    simon, it completely depends on why you want the eos 3 over the 20d, apart from the obvious. if there are features on the eos 3 that you don't have on the 20d, then go back to film. if not, stick with digital.

    i'm not bothered which i use. it's my budget that makes my choices for me. hence staying on film. i'd rather spend my money on something that will end up outlasting film (the way things are going) rather than getting something that in 2 years time i will want to upgrade. by which time my film costs in the same period would still not be up to the cost of upgrading.

    randomrubble
    12 Oct 2004 - 12:48 PM
    0

    I agree with Michael, the DSLR market is if anything changing even faster now than before, I am investing in lenses rather than pixels at the moment. If you were happy with the 10d then go digital again, if you just want a film camera to play around with then get second hand body which you might be able to ebay for most of what you've paid. Get the film scanned at processing stage, expensive in the long run, but you'll be able to scratch the itch without buying a film scanner.

    Even a second hand Eos 3 is not much over 300 now.

    u08mcb
    8
    5817 forum posts
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:00 PM
    0

    I have a digital camera but I still use film and enjoy it...

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:02 PM
    0

    I think we may see a slight slowdown in the DSLR market as lenses struggle to keep up with resolution - and digital resolution having now exceeded film on affordable DSLRs.

    Only 2-3 years ago you would have paid around 2200 for a Canon D60 (body only). Now you will pay less than half that for a 20D - a better camera in every way.

    Don't expect BIG price reductions from now on - there will be reductions but the camera manufacturers are well on the way to amortising their initial R&D on digital, first started I guess 10 years or so ago. So it will be incremental improvements and small price decreases from now on.

    There is never a right time to take the plunge!

    u08mcb
    8
    5817 forum posts
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:05 PM
    0

    Just have to wait for some brainbox to invent 3d photos you can explore on your pc to make everything expensive again...

    strawman
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:10 PM
    0

    I enjoy using both at the moment but that is because I have access to a dark room. When that goes I am not certain I will stick with film.

    Bernie
    8
    2201 forum posts
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:54 PM
    0

    No choice, has to be film.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Oct 2004 - 1:58 PM
    0

    Based on what, Bernie?

    Not quality or convenience that's for sure! Wink

    u08mcb
    8
    5817 forum posts
    12 Oct 2004 - 2:08 PM
    0

    Just for once don't be an arse about it eh?

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.