Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

Sigma DG 150-500mm 1:5-6.3 APO HSM


NDODS e2
4 3.7k 107 United Kingdom
27 Apr 2013 8:31PM
I received the above mentioned lens in January as part of late Christmas bundle. Since acquiring it I have noted that when the lens is working at it full focal length my images are not as sharp as they could be. This is the same case even when mounted on a sturdy tripod.
By screwing back the focal length to around 480mm the quality of my images has improved quite dramatically.

What I would like to know is, for those of you out there who have the afore mentioned lens "Are you or did you experience the same problem?"

Regards Nathan GrinGrinGrin

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Alec1 e2
7 4 United Kingdom
27 Apr 2013 8:44PM
Have not got this lens but know 2 people who have it, and they have had a lot trouble with it.!!
NEWMANP e2
6 1.6k 574 United Kingdom
27 Apr 2013 10:12PM
exactly the same Nathan. and to make matters worse it often looks sharper on the back of my camera than when i download them.

like you i am only happy just past 400 mm and with at least f9. i also think they are a bit hit and miss on focus accuracy when used at full 500 mm. that said i have had very good results as well as bad results

as a matter of interest my friend has the 400 mm version sigma zoom and it is also soft at full extent. ok for dreamy portraits but not as good for birds of a feather.

Phil
gary_d e2
7 576 13 Wales
28 Apr 2013 1:04PM

Quote:'Quote' exactly the same Nathan. and to make matters worse it often looks sharper on the back of my camera than when i download them,

They always will as there as been some degree of in camera sharpening applied to the jpeg file.




I do not have the lens now Nathan but when I did I experienced the very same, stop down to F8 and you will see an even greater improvement, light permitting of course.

Used properly as mentioned there are great images to be had with this great lens.

NDODS e2
4 3.7k 107 United Kingdom
28 Apr 2013 2:28PM
Some very interesting and very welcomed feedback, which when you consider the price of the blooming thing you would expect better.

Once I have enough evidence to satisfy my thirst for revenge I am going to contact Sigma to see what they say about the lens. Personally I feel that I have been robbed. The Sigmas specialist in my eyes was speaking crap, wish I had forked out more for the Canon equivalent.

"I know hindsight is a wonderful thing?"

Thanks once again

Regards Nathan GrinGrinGrin
annettep38 e2
3 188 32 France
2 May 2013 11:07PM
Only found this now, yes Nathan I had the same lens, Nikon edition and sold it fast, well as fast as I could. bought it from Jessops, tested it before buying, got another one fresh from the box and it was very annoying tried everything, had horrible CA in each and every shot.
And no, it isn't me or my technique, I bought a MF Nikon 500 f4 after that and never had those problems. And this is a much heavier lens...
But then there are others who were lucky.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.