Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

sigma 150-500mm nikon fit


maggie9 6 45 2 Scotland
28 Apr 2012 8:08PM
hi there,

apologies if this has already been covered somewhere else,

i've just spent a long time researching and saving for the 'above' to fit on to my nikon D90
and after having it a week im losing faith and feeling my money was ill spent Sad

i've found the focus not that great hand held (comparing it with my nikon 70-300mm VR) which is nearly always used hand held.

has anybody else found this? or im i missing a vital instruction to its use? or is it just a bit slow (or indeed im i just a bit slower.........)
pm me if you'd rather

(worried) Maggie

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

28 Apr 2012 8:55PM
Hi there,

My job is selling cameras and equipment. This is a lens that has always caused a few issues. Because it covers such a huge range the sharpness is compromised. The 150-500 is the cheaper way of getting a 500mm lens. It gives you the flexibility but like I say something has to be compromised and unfortunately it is the sharpness. For optimum sharpness the best lens would be a prime. I know it is a lot more expense but really it is going to be the only thing that will give you the best sharpness at that sort of range.

Hope that helps.
snapbandit 10 2.2k 3 Northern Ireland
28 Apr 2012 9:00PM
I find that the focus on the Sigma is slower than my 70-300 VR (& unless the light is bright/sunny it looks to me like the images from the Nikon have the edge in sharpness, contrast & colours, it just does not have the same reach)
I don't know that it being hand held would affect the focus though? (very likely to affect sharpness through camera shake as it's a heavy brute).
Must admit I regret getting the Sigma as I have only used it two or three times & find I prefer the Nik 300 f4 with 1,7x converter images for the 500mm end & have all the other lengths covered with other (better) lenses. it's not a bad lens but I find it needs bright conditions to get the best from it.

Just my 2p

Joe B
NEWMANP e2
6 1.6k 574 United Kingdom
28 Apr 2012 9:23PM
ive had my sigma 18 months or so, and there is no doubt about it, the 70-300 vr nikkor is better all round but it dosnt have the reach,

the 150-500 sigma is a hard tool to learn, it needs serious speed to avoid shake ( which is often mistaken for lack of sharpness) and to be fair 300 and 500 are different as chalk and cheese in terms of depth of field which is the other issue. i find that i start to feel happy around f10 and over a 1/1000 sec. at f8 im sometimes happy but never wider than that.

focus was a problem and they recalled many that wouldnt return once outfocused and i have always found it slow to lock on to a subject but once it has its fine. the sucess ratio is often lower than my other lenses and other than pay 6000 i dont see how we can compare with a prime.

a friend has just aquired a 300mm f4 and a converter and that looks a good option.
Phil
snapbandit 10 2.2k 3 Northern Ireland
28 Apr 2012 9:34PM
Sorry just to clarify, the Nik 300 f4 with 1.7x converter is use is the Nikon 300mm AF-s prime lens, (not the 70-300 VR as it's f5.6 @ 300mm end).

Joe B
NEWMANP e2
6 1.6k 574 United Kingdom
28 Apr 2012 9:38PM
yes and to further clarify, its not possible to use a converter on the nikkor 70-300 vr zoom
Phil
brrttpaul e2
3 203 United Kingdom
28 Apr 2012 9:40PM
Wink ty
MikeRC e2
9 3.5k United Kingdom
28 Apr 2012 9:42PM

Quote:a friend has just aquired a 300mm f4 and a converter and that looks a good option.


....one of these for sale in the classifieds.
NEWMANP e2
6 1.6k 574 United Kingdom
28 Apr 2012 9:46PM
and thats where my chum bought his 300 from and it was cheap as chips, he will be selingl his 70-300vr and still have change
Phil
maggie9 6 45 2 Scotland
29 Apr 2012 5:20PM
thanks for all this
thats fine about the 300mm
i knew the 70-300mm VR didn't support a teleconverter

thanks again for the replies much appreciated

maggie
greggan 7 6
7 May 2012 12:01AM
My opinion.Grin
If you looking for a 500mm reach zoom lens at a reasonable prize then there isn't much of a competition for the Sigma 150-500 OS!
At 500mm you will need to use a bit of technique and practice to get sharp pictures especially if you haven't been using optically stabilized
lenses before (Half-press the shutter button, wait a while until stabilized and shoot a series of 3 or more to be able to pick the sharpest one afterwards).
This is because of the fact that OS/VR/IS or whatever does fail sometimes and more often if you don't use it properly.

The Sigma 150-500mm OS isn't the sharpest knife in the PRO lens drawer but or many people it will be the best option.
Properly used you will be able to catch many useable pics with this lens that you wouldn't be able to get with a shorter lens.

Some image samples and a full review can be found here: http://www.stockholmviews.com/sigma_150-500_os/index.html
fox-1-.jpg


Sigma 150-500mm @ 500mm F8 shuterspeed 1/500 iso 100
maggie9 6 45 2 Scotland
7 May 2012 7:14AM
thanks so much for the info and advice and i have taken heart at all the replies

i was out again the other week and just sat on the beach and tried different settings for a few hours, mostly hand held, or lying flat on the sand with it balanced on top of my hand
i have to say, and this sounds really pathetic, i had really sore shoulders the next day!!

i like a challenge, so im going to enjoy getting the best out of this lens Smile

all very encouraging thanks again

maggie

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.