Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Sigma 70-200 or 170-500 for D300


WalidD300 e2
6 68 1 Scotland
19 Mar 2009 8:57PM
What woulkd you guys recommend?

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

uggyy e2
9 2.1k 9 Scotland
19 Mar 2009 9:01PM
Whats it for?

The sigma 70-200 F2.8 is an EX one, good quality pro sigma lens... The others ok but not in the same league.
WalidD300 e2
6 68 1 Scotland
19 Mar 2009 9:17PM
it is for wild life,
I would like to have nikon one but too expensive
uggyy e2
9 2.1k 9 Scotland
19 Mar 2009 9:20PM
Check out the Sigma 100-300 F4 if your on a budget, also look at getting a 1.4 covertor to go with it. Good combo... Very underrated lens for its size and quality/price.

The 70-200 F2.8 with a 1.4 works well too.

The 170-500 Ive not used but I dont think its as sharp or well made as the two above but Im sure someone else can answer on that one...

There is also the Nikon 80-400 VR which can be bought 2nd hand at reasonable price and well respected.

Tommy
WalidD300 e2
6 68 1 Scotland
19 Mar 2009 9:22PM
Thanks Tommy,
I will look at 70-200 or 100-300
19 Mar 2009 10:47PM
I've got the 70-200 f/2.8, beautiful lens. Perfectly sharp and very well built. No experience with the 170-500.
19 Mar 2009 11:26PM
I have got the Sigma 170 - 500 mm lens. I think it is not a bad lens. Please have a look to my last Red Kite shots. They are all done with the Sigma 170 - 500 mm lens. All my other bird and wildlife shots are done with the same lens.

Carsten
Nick_w e2
7 4.1k 99 England
19 Mar 2009 11:41PM
I'm with Tommy the 100-300 F4 is one of the most under rated lenses from Sigma - it takes a 1.4 TC well without any significant loss of image quality - quick auto focus. In terms of image quality it is by far and away the sharpest lens I have.
WalidD300 e2
6 68 1 Scotland
20 Mar 2009 9:55AM

Quote:I have got the Sigma 170 - 500 mm lens. I think it is not a bad lens. Please have a look to my last Red Kite shots. They are all done with the Sigma 170 - 500 mm lens. All my other bird and wildlife shots are done with the same lens.

Carsten



Very fond of your porto, all over really like the lighting in the dark shots,

Also, I like the 170-500mm, I will try it before I buy tho.

Thanks
strawman e2
11 22.0k 16 United Kingdom
20 Mar 2009 11:03AM
I used to have the 170-500, and used in the correct conditions and way it is effective, but I would say a lens like the newer 150-500 or the 100-300F4 (all from the sigma stable) have a greater range of conditions under which they will produce good images.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.