Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
What do you think, a 17-40 F4 L wide angle for landscapes or the 24-105 F4 L. Long lenses: the EF70-200 f2.8 L IS USM or EF100-400 f4.5-5.6 L. I've read that the 400L gives a sharper shot at the telephoto end rather than the f2.8 with a 2x extender, but as the 100-400 would be for the occasional shot only as I mostly do landscapes would the 70-200 be the better choice as its more of a mid range lens?.
Alternatives to the above and advice sought on this subject please
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Definitely the 17-40L for landscapes.
I also find the 17-40mm an excellent landscape lens,although occasionally I find myself wanting something a little wider.
The 100-400mm also makes a cracking landscape lens.
You don't specify what camera they would be used with - 35mm film or digital full frame or 1.3 or 1.6x crop?
sorry that would be a digital full frame, no crop
Try this link for a review of 100-400 vis 70-200 + x2
17-40 and 100-400, both will cover most requirements.
I have the 17-40 and 100-400 and the 28-135 IS (not L) to fill in the middle. This is just a great combination of glass to cover about anything.
Sometimes I want something a little wider..rarely want anything longer. I don't use the 28-135 as much since getting the 17-40 but would take as my only lens on a long trip if I wanted to travel light. Never took it off the camera in Greece for two weeks last year.
I also have the 100mm macro. However, with a 25mm extension tube the 100-400 and 28-135 really do great macro shots.
I have a 1.4 and 2x converter for the 100-400 but don't really find them very useful.
I will likely get the 70-200 2.8 and the 500 2.8 one day when the money is there.
70-200 2.8 is
the 2 best zoom lenses on the makket (without question)
+ maybe a 1.4 extender
i have the 10-22 but on the full frame maybe the 17-40, i have bought some primes, but the zomms above are equal (if not above)
i fancy the 100-400 but there is so much bad press about this lens, and it will take up les than10% of my shots i have held off, no doubt i will be getting it or the 400 4.0 soon
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar