Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Stop!

Forums > Lenses > Stop!

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last
    JackAllTog
    JackAllTog (e2 Member)
    4
    3268 forum postsJackAllTog vcard United Kingdom58 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 2:02 PM
    0

    I recently shot some street stuff in poor light at my limit of f4, i liked the out of focus bits f4 gave me and would like to try f2.8 but keep the zoom ability. Go for it.
    UNLESS you have no primes at all, if so get the 50mm f1.8 or even the smaller ones as Ade says. Remember you are on APS-c and he is FF so his 50mm is about your 35mm anyway.
    The one of Ade's and other's i really like though is the Canon EF 17-40mm f4L USM - Yummy, even at f4. Wish i actually had it.

    Last Modified By JackAllTog at 13 Jul 2012 - 2:03 PM
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    13 Jul 2012 - 2:02 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12300 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 2:30 PM
    0

    Why do you want a faster lens Chris.

    Could you just raise the ISO, would have thought your 10-20 would do.

    SlowSong
    SlowSong (e2 Member)
    4
    3082 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 4:15 PM
    1

    Yes, I do like the 10-20 and have used it for street but sometimes the extra reach is good.
    17-40 sounds good though Stuart. I'll have a look at that.
    I've got a 50m prime but always felt I needed a 35m when using it.

    SlowSong
    SlowSong (e2 Member)
    4
    3082 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 4:53 PM
    1

    OK, well the 17-40 f4 non IS is only about £150 cheaper than the 17-55 f2.8 IS USM.
    I'll put it on my list but it doesn't seem worth saving that amount of money.

    JackAllTog
    JackAllTog (e2 Member)
    4
    3268 forum postsJackAllTog vcard United Kingdom58 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 5:01 PM
    0


    Quote: I've got a 50m prime but always felt I needed a 35m when using it.

    I ended up with the 24-105mm - big and heavy but seems lovely most of the time, every now and again i think the 24-70mm should have been better for its f2.8 extra light and reduced DOF - I'm on APS-s.

    For Street photography I'm avidly waiting (though can't afford it) the new Canon Mirror less with a 40mm Pancake. The rumour i like most is it with the 650D APS-c sensor that goes up to ISO Loads and has full time AF in video ( which i don't use but see as useful).

    Ade_Osman
    Ade_Osman (e2 Member)
    10
    3921 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England31 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 5:13 PM
    0

    I have to admit I've been eyeing up that new 40mm Canon pancake lens, reckon it might be a belter on the end of a macro bellows system. But would be useful as a street lens too due to it's size.......

    See Here for more details on that.

    Ade

    SlowSong
    SlowSong (e2 Member)
    4
    3082 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 5:20 PM
    0


    Quote: For Street photography I'm avidly waiting (though can't afford it) the new Canon Mirror less with a 40mm Pancake. The rumour i like most is it with the 650D APS-c sensor that goes up to ISO Loads and has full time AF in video ( which i don't use but see as useful).

    Sounds good but I draw the line at another camera!

    I did have the Canon 50mm f1.4 but sent it back. Too long. I'm still tempted by a 30 or 35mm prime but I know I'll want the versatility of a zoom.

    I'm not doing much by way of talking myself out of the original lens. By the time I've made up my mind I'll probably have enough to buy it anyway. The weight and size put me off a bit though.

    Paintman
    Paintman (e2 Member)
    6
    653 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom155 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 5:54 PM
    2

    bulldog-gurning.jpg

    1-bulldogs-2.jpg

    1-the-management-2.jpg

    1-lloyd-and-ben--anticipation2.jpg

    All these were taken shooting from the hip with the 17-55mm f2.8 IS. It produces sharp photos straight from f2.8 and the auto focus is fast and accurate. I did a fair bit of research on this and other lenses in the 17mm to 55mm plus range and this was the best, imo, for a crop sensor camera. The image quality is excellent with the centre and edges showing excellent and very good sharpness, better than any of the independent lens makers ( according to the MTF charts ). ( I'm not including Leica or Zeiss in that remark as they make superb lenses, at a heck of a cost mind you ).

    I ummed and aarred about whether I could justify the cost, but once I'd bought it ( found a reasonable bargain on fleabay ) I didn't care as the results were very good and it was fun to use taking street shots. The f2.8 is very useful as the shutter speed will be higher than an f4 or f5.6 lens. Resale value is good too.

    Last Modified By Paintman at 13 Jul 2012 - 6:06 PM
    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12300 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 6:16 PM
    0

    How about simply getting a separate camera for your street stuff Chris, i now you already have a compact but its not quite the same as a proper small camera Smile Smile

    The x100 has dropped a fair bit now making it cheaper than a lot of lenses, then there`s the x10 that I find I prefer over the x100, faster and better focusing, and a good fast zoom.

    http://invisiblephotographer.asia/2012/01/24/streetphotography-japan-fujix10-par...

    Last Modified By Paul Morgan at 13 Jul 2012 - 6:24 PM
    SlowSong
    SlowSong (e2 Member)
    4
    3082 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 7:34 PM
    0

    I've been through all that with the X10 Paul. I'm glad I didn't go for it in the end. I definitely don't want another camera. You have to stop somewhere.
    Smile

    Terrific shots Paintman. When I see stuff like that I just know I really do want one. I dread what the other half would say though. Wink
    Smile

    Last Modified By SlowSong at 13 Jul 2012 - 7:36 PM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39068 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 8:15 PM
    0

    I can recall when it was launched, the feeling was the EF-S 17-55mm would normally have carried the 'L' designation, but Canon policy is (it is assumed) not to give that to EF-S lenses.

    Ade_Osman
    Ade_Osman (e2 Member)
    10
    3921 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England31 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 8:31 PM
    0

    Whay about the Canon EF IS USM 28-135mm, cheap as chips has a macro function and some folk reckon that it's as good as an "L" lens......I sold mine a little while ago as it didn't get used and I wanted the money to finance another lens I did want. But it was a very flexible bit of kit, used mine at weddings more than anything and it never gave me any problems.....

    Ade

    SlowSong
    SlowSong (e2 Member)
    4
    3082 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 9:23 PM
    0

    Not wide enough. Too long a zoom. Too slow - f3.5-5.6.

    OldTom1
    13 Jul 2012 - 9:26 PM
    0

    I use mine with my 7D and it is an awsome lens. I feel the same now about a 10-22, just for two or three shots at weddings. I can manage without it, but why should I?

    Last Modified By OldTom1 at 13 Jul 2012 - 9:27 PM
    Paintman
    Paintman (e2 Member)
    6
    653 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom155 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Jul 2012 - 9:29 PM
    0

    This is a review of the 17-55mm f2.8.

    This site has loads of lens reviews and is always my starting point for considering a new lens.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.