Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I have recently decided i want to close down the aperture a bit on my lens for studio work.
So need more power in my studio lights.
Question - (assuming everything else stays equal) if i'm shooting f8 but want f11, is it true my lights need to be twice as powerful - e.g. go from 150W to 300W?
or of i want f16 then if i need 600W lights.
I'm assuming single Fstops of 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22 and each one needs twice as much power.
Yes. Light obeys an inverse square rule, so twice as far away, 1/4 the light intensity. 3x as far, 1/9 the intensity, so then 1/2 distance, 4x the intensity.
So for twice the intensity you don't need to move them to half the distance, but somewhere in betweeen (1/sqr root of 2 to be exact....or about 70% the distance).
Nick
Don't forget that when you move the lights closer, then the character of the shadows will change - in this case, softer edged - because the light source will be 'bigger' in relation to the subject.
Just sayin'
good call - in many studio setups, you get a massive octobox softbox really really close to the model so you get no shadow at all... move the same light source several feet away, it'll be rather different
Quote: Question - (assuming everything else stays equal) if i'm shooting f8 but want f11, is it true my lights need to be twice as powerful - e.g. go from 150W to 300W?
or of i want f16 then if i need 600W lights.
Hmmm, the logic sounds correct, but is it actully true in practice?
Quote: Hmmm, the logic sounds correct, but is it actully true in practice?
Yes.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.














