0

Talking of Contrast

Forums > Taking photos > Talking of Contrast

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last
    adammalski
    29 May 2004 - 1:02 AM
    0

    What do we mean when we talk about 'contrast'? I know this is a tad trivial but any helpful comments will be appreciated. I am using Velvia 50 and I'm very happy with some of my slides taken in NZ. I would like to get prints - perhaps cibachrome but am concerned about the contrast issue.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    29 May 2004 - 1:02 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    In terms of film and paper, contrast is simply the brightness range from shadows to highlights that can be held without blocking up or burning out. Its normally expressed in logarithms, where a ratio of 2:1 is a difference of one stop, 4:1 is two stops, 8:1 is three stops etc.

    Research by Kodak claimed to show that the average brightness range is 128:1 or seven stops. It has been pointed out though, that contrast varies according to what latitude on the earth you are at - its much higher in the tropics, and reduces the further north (or south) on goes.

    Slide film has a narrower range than negative film, typically around 5 stops, where a neg film might be able to hold 7 or 8 stops. A decent B&W paper can hold around 6 to 7 stops IIRC, but paper can be had in varying degrees of hard (more contrast) or soft (less contrast) to suit the subject. Digital has a visible range similar to slide film, though it is possible to extract great detail from dense shadow areas.

    In terms of lenses being described as contrasty, its a matter of edge contrast or acutance. A contrasty lens will render a pair of lines - one black, one white - as just that, whereas a less contrasty lens will render them as shades of grey. Hope this helps.

    ron tate
    30 May 2004 - 8:52 PM
    0

    Hi
    Cibachrome was said to be contrasty. I tried it but found the set up a bit to messy for me and expensive. So now I have a couple of packets of 16*12 unused which i think will be unusable by now.

    Tim

    Thanks again for helpful insight. Funnily enough after I posted my question, a New Zealand photographic journal gave me some info,which is inline with your comments, so thank you. I look forward to posting my NZ shots on my return in July.

    Adam

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.