Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

tamron vs sigma

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
newmadgirl
5 Jul 2013 - 2:18 PM

hi I need some help
i'm planning on buying a new lens and a student so cash in tight and don't want to make a mistake on the lens
the two i'm thinking off are
Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens with Built in Motor for Canon DSLR Cameras
or
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Lens for Canon
has anyone got a yes or no to any of these two
thoughts please

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
5 Jul 2013 - 2:18 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Ade_Osman
Ade_Osman e2 Member 114435 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England36 Constructive Critique Points
5 Jul 2013 - 2:27 PM

Both the Tamron & Sigma have been reviewed on EPZ in the past, I think if it were me I'd plump for the focal length of the Tamron. An extra 20mm doesn't sound much, but it can make all the difference some days.....

pulsar69
pulsar69  91611 forum posts United Kingdom6 Constructive Critique Points
5 Jul 2013 - 11:51 PM

"An extra 20mm doesn't sound much, but it can make all the difference some days....."

Oh dear Blush

Ade_Osman
Ade_Osman e2 Member 114435 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England36 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2013 - 5:01 AM


Quote: Oh dear Blush

Personally I wouldn't buy either Andrew......But the question was asked Tongue

andart
andart  12478 forum posts United Kingdom
6 Jul 2013 - 9:10 AM

have a look at tamron 365 road test

seahawk
seahawk e2 Member 6487 forum postsseahawk vcard United Kingdom
6 Jul 2013 - 9:11 AM

I have the Sigma - I tried both in the camera shop but felt the Sigma was better built. Optically not a lot to choose between them and in my opinion the extra 20mm of the Tamron is insignificant, especially as I felt the Sigma was slightly sharper at full zoom. The differences are not huge, however, so it will come down to what feels better in your hand.

Pushendu
9 Jul 2013 - 8:18 AM

Hi,
I am sorry for late reply, hope younhaven't made the purchase yet. Sigma lenses have better build quality and optics than Tamron for any lens model. Sigma is considered as 1.2 - 1.4 times better than Tamron. But honestly the new Tamron 24-70 2.8. And 70-200 are good enough. Can you quicky tell me your purpose. Because its really the lenses that make difference. If you are not buying for professional work, then I will suggest a 70-200 or 24-70. Depends upon your purpose, don't go for multipurpose lens ranging too much. They have shity optics and you will start hating it soon. My suggestion is a 50mm 1.8 by canon + 70-200 by sigma or tamron.
Thanks and Cheers!

mikehit
mikehit e2 Member 45761 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom9 Constructive Critique Points
9 Jul 2013 - 8:46 AM


Quote: Sigma is considered as 1.2 - 1.4 times better than Tamron

I would be interested to know what those numbers mean.

Pushendu
9 Jul 2013 - 10:46 AM

Hmmm. Thanks for reading carefully. Well, its a scale used to compare the performance and optics of lenses, here Tamron scored 1 and sigma between 1.2 - 1.4 on average while canon scored 2.
So, on a scale of 10,
Canon - 10
Sigma - 6-7
Tamron - 5
Note, scaling used to compare only 3 brands.

Ao, if canon gives 100% efficient image quality, at same settings, lenses with similar focql length will give, Sigma 60-70% of canon, tamron 50% if canon.

Thanks.

mikehit
mikehit e2 Member 45761 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom9 Constructive Critique Points
9 Jul 2013 - 1:44 PM

I will rephrase the question: what are these numbers, how are they arrived at?
How do you have '60% image quality'?

arhb
arhb e2 Member 62052 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom67 Constructive Critique Points
9 Jul 2013 - 2:03 PM

I don't own any Tamron lenses, but I have returned a Sigma lens because of AF malfunction.
Sigma have a quality control reputation that has been discussed on epz more than once since I've been frequenting the site.
When you get a good Sigma lens, it is very good - I have had 3 Sigma lenses that have been excellent.
If you get the dodgy one that got through QC, it's a pain in the butt! This has happened once

I'm not aware of these issues with Tamron.

Pushendu
9 Jul 2013 - 6:05 PM

Hi,
Seems like you havent used any canon L series lens ever, please test it and sigma. You will come to know what I meant by 60-70% quality. Wink

Pushendu
9 Jul 2013 - 6:07 PM

And, people who talk about facts and figures are stats people or accounts person, creative people should not get into these things.

snapbandit
9 Jul 2013 - 6:11 PM

just curious, who carried out these IQ tests? & where can we see/find the results & testing criteria?

would be interesting to see.

arhb
arhb e2 Member 62052 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom67 Constructive Critique Points
9 Jul 2013 - 6:17 PM

I mentioned QC = quality control, which is about testing finished products for functionality before the are sold to consumers.
Nothing to do with IQ = image quality

Last Modified By arhb at 9 Jul 2013 - 6:17 PM

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.