Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Tele-Converter for the Nikon 300mm f/2.8

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    PJSPhotography
    23 Nov 2009 - 3:31 PM

    Hi,

    I'm thinking about getting myself a tele-converter to go with my 300mm f/2.8 lens. One of these - http://www.mifsuds.com/acatalog/Nikon_Tele_Converters.html

    Will be mainly used for photographs of small birds etc... I'm not sure which one to get, maybe the 1.7x one? Any advice?


    Cheers,

    Pete

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    23 Nov 2009 - 3:31 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    User_Removed
    23 Nov 2009 - 4:08 PM

    Don't discount the Kenko Pro DX 300 range

    PJSPhotography
    23 Nov 2009 - 4:23 PM

    Looking around the web it looks like the Nikon 1.7x one is the way forward. Not reading great reviews about the Kenko one compared to the Nikon one. I think I would pay the extra for the Nikon.

    samfurlong
    23 Nov 2009 - 4:33 PM

    Until recently my friend has been using the Nikon 300mm 2.8VR (current model) with both of these convertors.

    Optically the 1.4 and 1.7 are very close, you really can't see any difference image quality wise but you do loose 1.5 stops with the 1.7 as opposed to the 1.4 which only costs you a stop. AF seems unaffected when using this setup on a D3, we have been off photographing birds such as red kite, peregrine falcons and puffins in flight, have done the falcons hunting etc.. lots of good fast action stuff and the convertors do not seem to have hindered his AF. His hit rate is pretty similar to mine using longer lenses such as the 500f4 and no convertors..

    He has just gotten the 400mm so has sold the 300 but is continuing to use both the convertors with the new lens with great results.

    Last Modified By samfurlong at 23 Nov 2009 - 4:34 PM
    PJSPhotography
    23 Nov 2009 - 4:42 PM

    Thanks, good info. I'm temped with the 1.7x converter I think. Only looking to get one at the moment, I think that one would be more useful?

    LenShepherd
    LenShepherd e2 Member 62511 forum postsLenShepherd vcard United Kingdom
    25 Nov 2009 - 3:45 PM

    My advice is get both 1.4e and 1.7e - which gets you either 420mm or 510mm effective with a 300 f2.8.

    PJSPhotography
    25 Nov 2009 - 3:49 PM

    Yes that would be nice, but I can only stretch to one of these at the moment. I think the 1.7x would be more useful, but I'm not sure Smile

    Outlander
    Outlander  573 forum posts
    25 Nov 2009 - 4:26 PM

    i have the Nikon 1.4 and can highly recommed it,i did have the 2.0 but sold it, it was ok if you stopped down to around F11 or further,not at all good for anything which moved.

    PJSPhotography
    25 Nov 2009 - 4:30 PM

    Thank you Smile

    geniehawk
    geniehawk  7181 forum posts England
    25 Nov 2009 - 4:37 PM

    I use the 1.7 and can recommend it, the extra reach is worth the extra money!

    Jeannie.

    PJSPhotography
    27 Nov 2009 - 7:58 PM

    Ok I've placed an order for the 1.7x Should be a nice one for my 300mm f/2.8 lens Smile Looking forward to trying it out next week.

    Thanks for all your help !!

    Pete

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.