Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Tescos recently made the error of putting on line an offer of a new Ipad at 49.99, And obviously did not Honour this price as it was in the T&Cs That they had to right to cancel, It reminded me of debates on here in the past as this is quite a common occurrence with on line purchases, That people still think that an advertised on line price is binding in any way and get quite upset when the sale is canceled by the seller.
The comment under the article still show most peaple still dont understand this point, I can remember a simuler discussion on here ref the 5dmk2 when the price suddenly rose by a few hundred pounds.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Not a very good one then.
Quote: PR stunt.
If nobody had heard of "Tesco" and the incident showed them in a good light as a competent company then maybe - but no, it's just an error.
Quote: peaple still dont understand this point,
Yes, it's such an urban myth, I've often heard the "bloke in the pub" affirm that "if they price it at that then they have to honour that price".
I'm surprised that they were able to back out of the deal AFTER taking the punter's money.
In law, a contract exists when a merchant has accepted full payment. Is it legal for them to have T&Cs that allow them to back out - Unfair terms in Contracts Act 1973?
The exchange of goods has not happened so no sale has been completed. Most pre-orders like that allow the buyer to pull out before delivery so it will work both ways.
Think of the situation where there is a projected release of a product and they take pre-orders. If the product is then cancelled due to manufacturing errors or design flaws, that would leave the vendor open to legal action which would be clearly unfair.
Equally contract law does permit cancellation of a contract if there is a clear imbalance of obligations - it is not often enforced because it is so hard to prove but the mechanism is there.
Contract law on sale of goods is well settled.
A seller, on line or in shop premises is not, in contractual terms, offering goods for sale, it is an invitation to treat.
The prospective purchaser is offering to buy at the price indicated by the seller. There is no contract unless and until the seller accepts the purchaser's offer to buy at that price.
Quote: I'm surprised that they were able to back out of the deal AFTER taking the punter's money
I thought so too. I thought once they take the money, then a contract is formed?
I don't believe they had taken any cash as it was pre-order, just journalist adding that line for drama, My understanding is that the cash is taken on shipping.
And believe you are also correct once the cash has been taken then a contract is made, although it may be that a deposit was taken which im not sure where that lays in legal land.
Quote: My understanding is that the cash is taken on shipping
hmmmm....for preorder, why would they need take the money on shipping first?
That's what I'm saying, the iPad is not in the shops yet as demand is so massive, so orders was in a very large queue, and nearly all sellers do not take the cash untill it's being shipped including tescos. So where the quote about cash being refunded came from I do not understand.
Unless a deposit was taken of whic I have no idea if this was so
This explains it better, even tho it is the sun
ah....I totally misread what you said, Kev.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar