Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Can anyone expand on the differences between hard and soft graduated filters please? I don't have a tremendous amount of experience with graduated filters but have used standard neutral density filters before.
I am just completing my Lee set and require some graduated filters to compliment my big stopper. I generally take cityscapes and landscapes.
Thanks a lot guys
Hard grads have a relatively quick transition from full ND to clear. Soft grads it is more gradual. The rate of change in both cases differs between manufacturers.
Hard grads are usually used for 'clean' horizonssuch as seascapes - if you used them for places where something like a tree or a lighthouse crosses the transition zone you may notice the effect across its middle. So for uneven horizons you would use a soft grad.
If you are using a APS-C camera the usual recommendation is to have a hard grad because the transition zone is proportionately more of the image size than on a 35mm sensor.
Lee (and HiTech) do NDs that are 150mm long and the advantage of these is that you have more latitude on where you place the transition zone, though the shorter 100mm NDs will still give you reach over a vast majority of the sensor.
So if you have APS-C sensor (I have a D7000) and want to take an uneven horizon should you still use a hard grad over a soft one?
My initial response would be 'yes' but it depends on how uneven the horizon is and what is causing it. For example on a white lighthouse the grad cutting through it will be more obvious than on a tree or a hillside, and even then you may think that it is worthwhile spending the time doing some exposure correction in post processing to avoid buying 2 sets of filters. I would say buy the hard set and progress to soft if you need it.
id buy 2 filters. Lee 0.9 hard and 0.9 soft. they cover most situations as the soft can be pushed up and down and used in tandem with the hard when required. to be fair i hardly use my 0.6s (and i have both) and i would never have used 0.3s even if i had bought them.
i think you would use a 0.9 soft more than hard if you only want to buy one, particularly with the cityscapes, with landscapes hard are really only totally suitable with pretty level horizons but are invaluable with seascapes.
see, thats my view and Mikehit above has his which are opposite but equally valid, you will just have to see what suits you best.
Phil
HDR is an alternative... with CS5's lovely new refine mask edge, you can layer shots easier than before too
I'd go for Hard edge grads on that camera.
On DX sensors they act like soft grads d on FX sensors.
You may find this of interest.
I'd say that soft were the one's to go for if you intend doing cityscapes mainly or live in a particularly mountainous area, and shoot in the valleys a lot. Otherwise I would say hards are the way to go. I have a set of both (0.3stop hard excepted), and use the hards 90% of the time (sometimes use a soft and hard combined though). Depends on what you envisage shooting mostly I suppose.
Phils suggestion is probably a good compromise though.
![]()
jeez, this isnt easy. looks like ill go for a mixture, they aren't cheap but i dont want to make the wrong choice either.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.















