Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

The Fujifilm FinePix X100 has arrived! (Interactive review!)


keithh e2
11 23.4k 33 Wallis And Futuna
17 Mar 2011 7:03AM
Though I'd like to see how it performed in the real world and I applaud Fuji for releasing it. I just can't see any substantial market for this camera.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 7:18AM
Regarding the lens, the Sigma DP1 is 28mm equivalent, the DP2, 41mm equivalent, and the Leica X1 35mm equivalent.

However, all of these, and the Mirrorless ILC cameras (NEX, PEN, NX, m43rds), need an optional optical viewfinder, and then if you do use an optical viewfinder, you're limited to a specific lens. If you want an electronic viewfinder for any of these, it's an additional expense, if available.

The unique strengths of the X100 are the combination of optical (and electronic) viewfinder built into the body, with the DSLR (APS-C) sized sensor. If they went with a zoom lens the camera would need to be bigger, and the optical / electronic viewfinder combined may not have worked (or been much larger, or been an optional add-on electronic viewfinder).
keithh e2
11 23.4k 33 Wallis And Futuna
17 Mar 2011 8:32AM
Fuji won't sell this to the general Market with a fixed lens. So how many DSLR users will shell out a grand on what will be a second camera?
joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 10:25AM
Sample video added to the review - continuous focus mode - it's quite quiet when focusing.
joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 11:23AM
Added shots taken at different apertures.
skuzzbag 5 3
17 Mar 2011 12:25PM
I suppose my main concern is that the images so far don't look too sharp. Are these unprocessed (apart from colour) RAW images? I'd expect at 1000 with a decent sized sensor for it to blow something like the LX3 (my last experience with a compact) out of the water but I'm not seeing that at all!
spaceman 10 5.2k 3 Wales
17 Mar 2011 12:50PM
I don't understand why the film equivalents from Leica, Contax, Voightlander etc, have interchangable lenses but these digital cameras don't.
joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 1:15PM

Quote:I suppose my main concern is that the images so far don't look too sharp. Are these unprocessed (apart from colour) RAW images? I'd expect at 1000 with a decent sized sensor for it to blow something like the LX3 (my last experience with a compact) out of the water but I'm not seeing that at all!


These are JPEGs straight from the camera - stopped down the images get much sharper - the camera is on default settings. There are options to alter colour, sharpness, highlight tone, shadow tone, and much more beyond this. I suspect sharper images will come straight out of the camera as JPEGs with sharpness turned up. All shots have been taken as RAW as well (Although due to lack of processing software and size I haven't uploaded these onto the site).
joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 2:54PM
Added views through the optical/hybrid/electronic viewfinder and rear screen. Hopefully this should show what the main hybrid optical viewfinder feature "looks" like in real use. Smile
Hynee 3 1
17 Mar 2011 4:33PM
Hi first post here.
I'd like to see a landscape shot (or anything focused further than 5-10m) at f/2. I'd like to see how good the lens is wide open, with the centre, edges and corner all in focus, but all the f/2 sample shots I've seen around the web are closeup shots with lots of bokeh at the edges.
The f/2 macro shot in this review is quite low contrast even in the centre, but the lens may not be designed for that aperture at that distance. (Macro is generally stopped down anyway.)
joshwa e2
4 710 United Kingdom
17 Mar 2011 4:34PM
We will be adding more shots shortly Smile
Paul Morgan e2
13 16.1k 6 England
17 Mar 2011 5:48PM

Quote:I don't understand why the film equivalents from Leica, Contax, Voightlander etc, have interchangable lenses but these digital cameras don't


There all system camera`s, the range finder equivalent of the slr, but there was no shortage of fixed lens rangefinders made, Olympus, Canon etc, the x100 is the digital equivalent of the former and many of these would have been just as expensive in there day.


Quote:I suppose my main concern is that the images so far don't look too sharp


Could you put a few raw images up in the download section.
dcash29 9 2.0k England
17 Mar 2011 6:04PM
Old fashioned......new fashion for gadget mad youngsters and a trip back to the good old days for the older generation
Paul Morgan e2
13 16.1k 6 England
17 Mar 2011 6:28PM
dcash29 9 2.0k England
17 Mar 2011 6:50PM

Quote:Its simply the modern digital version of any of these.


Yeah i know, my point being fashion has come full circle. I still cant see what all the fuss is about.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.