Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

The Human Eye

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    Nigeyboy
    Nigeyboy  6537 forum posts United Kingdom
    9 May 2008 - 2:12 PM

    Hi all

    Just had a text from a bored friend at work! He has discovered that researchers have concluded the human eye has a resolution of 576 megapixels!! So 57 times my 400D then!!

    Imagine the RAW and Jpeg file size . . . . .!!!!!!

    Makes you think though - how much info the human eye and brain process every day!

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    9 May 2008 - 2:12 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    keith selmes
    9 May 2008 - 2:34 PM

    The processing is fine, its the storage and data retrieval I have issues with.

    joolsb
    joolsb  927115 forum posts Switzerland38 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 2:40 PM

    I often find that the processing deteriorates when certain chemicals (e.g. ethanol) are present in high concentrations.... Smile

    Last Modified By joolsb at 9 May 2008 - 2:41 PM
    DaveU
    DaveU e2 Member 81339 forum postsDaveU vcard England121 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 2:43 PM

    Even worse with methanol Jools ...... hic.

    banehawi
    banehawi Critique Team 10845 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2836 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 3:33 PM

    Can be a little soft wide open too

    User_Removed
    9 May 2008 - 4:26 PM


    Quote: Can be a little soft wide open too

    Especially first thing in the morning Smile

    Col

    keith selmes
    9 May 2008 - 5:23 PM

    I find the shutter can be a bit sticky in the mornings.

    discreetphoton
    discreetphoton Site Moderator 93452 forum postsdiscreetphoton vcard United Kingdom20 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 8:50 PM

    mine seems to have problems with the auto focus over long distances. Much better at macro work.

    cameracat
    cameracat  108578 forum posts Norfolk Island61 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 9:45 PM

    I'm crap at maths....But the RAW data files would be around 570 Mb each......+ or - a bit.....Smile

    But if this figure is for 2 eye's then it would be 1140 Mb, Give or take.....And thats assuming the bit rate is similar to most DSLR's.....Sad

    JJGEE
    JJGEE  96291 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
    9 May 2008 - 10:15 PM

    ISO range, lack of noise & HDR are all pretty good as well !

    keith selmes
    9 May 2008 - 11:23 PM


    Quote: better at macro work

    Ah. mIne are the opposite. Have to fit CU filters just to find out who I'm talking to.

    Quote: lack of noise

    As above, uncorrected, noise is all I see!

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.