Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Thoughts- Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Lens or nikon 10-24 or 12-24


13 Feb 2013 8:32PM
Hi , I am going to purchase a wide angle lens for landscape photography and was wondering your thoughts as to best option for my entry level D3100.
Sigma 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM Lens
Nikon 12-24mm f/4G ED IF Autofocus DX Nikkor Zoom Lens
Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX Nikkor Lens
I realise sigma cheaper option but I will only buy 1 so don't mind too much on price.
Thanks for any thoughts

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

widtink e2
2 406 2 Scotland
13 Feb 2013 10:10PM
I have the Sigma 10-20 and its a great lens Smile I use it on my D7000 and it produces some really dramatic picsSmile

Rod
User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
13 Feb 2013 10:22PM
Interesting debate that's been had many times before.

Add to the mix the Tokina 12-24mm (equal to the Nikon optically - and a metal construction) - their new 2mm increased 12-26mm(???) or their 11-16mm...

The 12-24mm (Tokina) is my 'live-on' lens and I love it. Rugged and sharp.

One 'down-side'... their International Warranty s only for 6mths. I bought mine from HK many moons ago and, when I tackled the supplier about this, they personally Warranted the lens for 12mths without question. Since the, I have not had a problem.

Wink
13 Feb 2013 10:28PM
I had the Sigma and it was wonderful. Wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.
KONIN e2
3 252 England
13 Feb 2013 10:57PM
i had the sigma 10-20 but was not totally happy coud not pin point why so sold it and bought the nikon 12-24 f4 much happier now with the results its a better lens all round , for me any way
stu
14 Feb 2013 12:33AM
I have the Sigma 10-20mm f3.5 on a Canon 60D and I love it. It's rarely off the body these days. Wink

Andy
KNS 5 106 2 United Kingdom
14 Feb 2013 12:53AM
Got the Nikon 12 - 24 great lens, but then many are at this focal length/zoom range.....
javam e2
10 1.1k 19 United Kingdom
14 Feb 2013 10:26AM
I have the cheaper sigma 10-20 (f4-5.6) for my 7D. I could count on the fingers of one hand (ok maybe two) how often I used it wide open when I had one for my Pentax so could not see the point of getting the f3.5. Especially as I would have then needed another lee w/a filter adapter to fit it and the f4-5.6 is the same filter size as my 24-105 and 100-400.

Was very happy with the pentax fit one I had and very happy with this one.

I will only change it if/when I get a full frame camera.
MalcolmS e2
9 1.1k 13 England
14 Feb 2013 2:09PM
Sigma 10-20mm F4 terrific lens, only got rid when I went full frame. There have been many threads over the years about this lens and they all say basically the same thing. If your main use is on top of a tripod, you don't need the F3.5 version either.
14 Feb 2013 7:04PM
I have the f4 10-20 lens, very pleased with it,
this is a bit off the subject but interesting. i had a canon40d converted to infrared with a 720nm filter put in, i tried the 10-20 on IR and it was rubbish, so i left it for a while, then a couple of months later i went out with the IR camera and when i got the camera out i was horrified, i still had the sigma on it. so i went ahead and spent the day taking shots but thinking i was wasting my time, but some of the best IR shots i have ever done were there, i had to make another set of actions to get the effects i wanted, and got some effects i did not bargain on, i was at Painshill park in october, one amazing effect i got was a shot of a tree and white bridge over a stream with almost natural range of colours, its half IR and half "normal" it seems it does not like the summer IR very smeared near the frame edges. lots to do to get used to these random effects.
Mike_Smith e2
7 213 1 United Kingdom
15 Feb 2013 6:00PM
Cant Speak for the other lens But the Sigma 10 - 20 is a cracking lens that wont dissapoint. Lately i havent used mine much but i will be this year
24 Feb 2013 11:34AM
I decided to go for the Sigma , build quality seems good and am looking forward to some better weather to get out there taking shots .Thanks to all for comments.
24 Feb 2013 12:04PM
I'd go for the Sigma lens, Bought mine early last year and it is always on either my EOS 7D or 40D.
Most of the landscape shots I took in Cornwall were taken with the Sigma:
http://s163.beta.photobucket.com/user/taffsbike/media/Cornwall%20Shots/IMG_0585.jpg.html?sort=3&o=52#/user/taffsbike/media/Cornwall%20Shots/IMG_0583.jpg.html?sort=3&o=53&_suid=136170717573304475565469351605
You won't be disappointed.Smile
annettep38 e2
3 188 32 France
27 Feb 2013 11:24PM
I have had both the 10--20 sigma and the 12-24 nikkor. The latter was far better in the corners and in the shadows. Would still use if I hadn't changed format.
28 Feb 2013 2:42AM
I have the 10-20 Sigma on my Rebels.. and love it as a 'art' lens.. the ability to add incredible depth, and twist a bit of perspective makes it fun..sees light very well too..

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.