Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Can anybody help here please
I am going to take photos of my 11 weeks old baby, the background is white, D300, 50mm f1.8 and sigma 150mm f2.8 photos will b indoors
any advice will be appreciated
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Iron the white background or the creases will really show, unless you've got lights to burn the background out with.
dont use flash if you can help it , it can damage babies eyes. do a search on the gallery on here for inspiration
Quote: Dont use flash if you can help it , it can damage babies eyes.
I take it you have some evidence for that statement. I think the manufacturers of flashguns would want the benefit of your experience.
just what ive read in a few different places. would have thought it wouldnt really be worth taking the risk................
If flash damaged babies eyes the Daily Mail would have told us long ago.
Its a pity when this sort of nonsense enters our consciousness, unfortunately it has a habit of taking hold and becoming the received truth by the unquestioning.
wow. so would you take the risk then?
I wouldn't take the risk, not even thinking of taking it any way
Unless you can generate very soft flash lighting you would be better off using natural light anyway, it is likely to be more flattering and less disturbing to the little chap.
Get on the same level and relax and enjoy it.
Quote: Wow. so would you take the risk then?
I think this has pretty well been disproved. Anyway, if it were true, there'd be a load of blind babies around don't you think?
Quote: If flash damaged babies eyes the Daily Mail would have told us long ago.
Ah but the Sun did
Seriously I'm with Stolzy on this one. it certainly would not be a great idea to stick a flash a couple of inches away from a baby's face but in the normal studio setting of softboxes and diffused light I doubt if there are are any issues at all. It certainly wouldn't worry me to use studio flash to take baby photos.
i just dont think its worth taking the risk using a potentially damaging light source on a subject that doesnt really need it. its not like you need the flash to freeze any action or anything like that
Quote: Ah but the Sun did
Must be true then !!!
Quote: Quote:Ah but the Sun did Must be true then !!!
Such a shame when this sort of nonesense gets promolgated. Eventually the uncritical start to believe it simply because it is repeated often enough.
Millions, perhaps billions of pictures of babies have been taken of babies using flash - do you really think that noone would have noticed?
This doesn't seem too seriious, but people die from this. How many children have died or become deaf because they didn't get their MMR? All because the gullible and uncritical believed an urban myth.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar