Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

What (Old) Telephoto lens?

Community > Groups > Micro Four Thirds > Forums > What (Old) Telephoto lens?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Members Only

You must be logged in or registered to join a group
Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    7 Aug 2012 - 11:43 AM
    0

    What old telephoto lens would you recommend for (any) Micro Four Thirds camera?

    I'm thinking of the 200mm Olympus Zuiko f/4, or perhaps the Canon 200mm f/4 FD, but there are many old primes available, many with names I've never heard of, available on ebay...

    Let me know what you think, and if you have suggestions or examples please let me know.

    Thanks Josh

    (PS - this is posted in the EVIL/CSC/M4/3 Users And Meets group, and replying will make you a member of this group)

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    7 Aug 2012 - 11:43 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    johnriley1uk
    johnriley1uk (e2 Member)
    8
    26 forum postsjohnriley1uk vcard United Kingdom3 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Aug 2012 - 1:01 PM
    0

    The Olympus OM and Pentax Takumar (M42) or M series (K bayonet) lenses should fit the bill. Lenses from other manufacturers will be heavy and unwieldy by comparison. The compact lenses may fit in better with the ergonomics of the CSC camera bodies.

    Pete
    Pete (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    12
    18226 forum postsPete vcard ePz Advertiser England95 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 1:49 PM
    0

    Josh' question was interesting as I had a few 200mm's to hand I thought it a good idea to shoot a few comparison photos with them. 200mm f/4s on the OM-D I don't have any Olympus lenses and wonder if I should get hold of some as their OM series were lovely and compact.

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12310 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 1:55 PM
    0

    Lol Pete and I`ve not long since given away a Zuiko 75-150mm, not particularly fast with its constant f4 aperture but it was lovely and small.

    The 135mm Zuiko was a really lovely lens, makes for a handy focal length taking into account the crop, theres several here.

    http://www.lcegroup.co.uk/Secondhand-Search/?SHMake=Olympus&SHModel=&SHT...

    I`ve also started another thread in this group since the EM5 is thought to be good for IR.

    http://www.ephotozine.com/groups/evil-csc-m4-3-users-and-meets-764/forums/topic/...

    Last Modified By Paul Morgan at 10 Aug 2012 - 1:58 PM
    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    10 Aug 2012 - 1:57 PM
    0

    I've got the 135mm f/3.5 it's very nice - had some VERY sharp results on a four thirds DSLR - I think there's an f/2.8 as well. I haven't used it on the OM-D yet!

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12310 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 2:00 PM
    0

    Did you have many legacy lenses that you used with 4/3 Josh.

    Only asking because I had quite a few including lensbabys, so I picked up just one 4/3 to M4/3 adapter.

    You can use a 4/3 and M4/3 adapter together.

    Since getting the 45mm M my legacy 50mm`s have become redundant.

    And this morning my sigma 19mm arrived, so I also have a vivitar 19mm un used Smile

    Last Modified By Paul Morgan at 10 Aug 2012 - 2:03 PM
    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    10 Aug 2012 - 2:05 PM
    0

    I had / have a couple of OM lenses (50mm, f/1.4, 135mm f/3.5) and some m42 lenses from Zenit cameras, a couple of 28/3.5 (pentacon and cosina?) Helios 58/2 springs to mind, maybe a 44/2 as well as the Industar 50/3.5 - very pancakey on the 43rd - but less so on the m43:

    industar-50-2-35.jpg

    Last Modified By joshwa at 10 Aug 2012 - 2:07 PM
    brian1208
    brian1208 (e2 Member)
    9
    9088 forum postsbrian1208 vcard United Kingdom12 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 3:37 PM
    0

    I picked up an old sigma 180 f5.6 macro cheaply which I am trying on the EM5 using the kipon adapter. Its a nice size and weight to use with the body + battery grip but its proving less easy to use than a 200 f4 canon FD I used on the Panasonic G1 I had some time back as the DOF is paper thin and it really needs to be stopped down hard to make it work at its best.

    Got a few reasonable shots though so I'm going to persevere with it

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12310 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 4:59 PM
    0

    I`ve picked up an old Canon 85mm f1.2, but its a bit big and heavy and think an 85mm f1.8 or f2 would be more than enough.

    Sooty_1
    Sooty_1 (Critique Team)
    2
    962 forum posts United Kingdom161 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 7:01 PM
    0

    The old OM 100 mm Zuiko was a great lens, as was the 85 mm. Both are tiny for 35 mm bodies, so should be right for a 4/3 one. I have had both and can vouch for their sharpness.

    Nick

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12310 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    10 Aug 2012 - 8:56 PM
    0


    Quote: The old OM 100 mm Zuiko was a great lens

    One of my fav lenses from the film days.

    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    11 Aug 2012 - 1:43 PM
    0

    img-7130.jpg

    Olympus 135 f/3.5

    p8110104-135mm-f35--custom-.jpg

    img-7131.jpg

    Olympus 50mm f/1.4

    p8110102-50mm-f14--custom-.jpg

    "Super Paragon" f3.3 200mm (m42)

    p8110106-200mm-paragon-33--custom-.jpg

    Canon 200mm f/4 FD

    p8110107-canon-200mm-f4--custom-.jpg

    Canon 80-200mm f/4.5-5.6 II (EOS mount) at 200mm f5.6

    p8110111-80-200-f56--custom-.jpg

    img-7134-omd-canon-50mm--custom-.jpg

    Canon EOS 50mm f/1.4

    p8110115-canon-eos-50-14--custom-.jpg

    img-7133-omd-industar-50--custom-.jpg

    Industar 50mm f/3.5:

    p8110116-industar-50mm-f35--custom-.jpg

    Last Modified By joshwa at 11 Aug 2012 - 2:53 PM
    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    11 Aug 2012 - 8:36 PM
    0

    Here are some shots I took out and about with the Industar 50 3.5 m42 - I'm quite convinced that the adapter I have for it, has it set too far away, as it's better than it should be at macro, and doesn't focus to infinity Smile

    p8110132-industar-50--custom-.jpg

    p8110134-industar-50--custom-.jpg

    Here's a crop of the photo above at (nearly) actual pixels

    p8110134-industar-051.jpg

    Last Modified By joshwa at 11 Aug 2012 - 8:37 PM
    joshwa
    joshwa (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    2
    520 forum postsjoshwa vcard United Kingdom
    11 Aug 2012 - 9:04 PM
    0

    While looking at lenses on ebay, I came across this guy:
    http://shutter-releasing.blogspot.tw/

    He has tried a number of rare lenses and posted photos from them.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.