Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I have to setup lighting for a photo studio that is going to be used for used automobile photography that this company sells. I don’t but part of my job at this company.
I need some advice with regards to lighting for a studio like these:
http://www.s3studiorentals.com/en/read/x-large-studios/stage-a.html
http://www.1880studios.com/images/Flats.jpg
There’s a 40x12 feet white backdrop with a 40x18 feet reflector on top. The facility is going to be used for (used) automobile photography.
The tricky part is that the facility is going to be used for photography + video at the same time therefore I need to decide what sort of light can do both jobs. Continuous is the answer but what type? Daylight, as used in sample pictures, or halogen which gets hot!
Would really appreciate any feedback. I need to have powerful lights that can be directed towards the reflector to illuminate the subject rather than direct lighting which could create hot spots over the metallic/shiny surface of cars.
Seems like a complete waste of money to me - all the dealers I know use a particular spot on their respective lots and use a compact. Or get a pro in for the odd one where something larger than a brochure shot is needed...
Best o' luck! ![]()
Quote: Seems like a complete waste of money to me - all the dealers I know use a particular spot on their respective lots and use a compact. Or get a pro in for the odd one where something larger than a brochure shot is needed...
Best o' luck!
Thanks for the comments ... the person who set it up has now left and I need to get the job finished ... but this is irrelevant info!
If you have nothing constructive to talk about then please don't reply to posts ... you are wasting others time!
Quote: If you have nothing constructive to talk about then please don't reply to posts ... you are wasting others time!
I will reply and comment as I wish friend... ![]()
Quote: If you have nothing constructive to talk about then please don't reply to posts ... you are wasting others time!
How to win friends and influence people. A quick browse of Mike's portfolio would have shown you he is one of the best around at photographing cars and a polite enquiry might have yielded some very useful help.
Quote: Quote:If you have nothing constructive to talk about then please don't reply to posts ... you are wasting others time!How to win friends and influence people. A quick browse of Mike's portfolio would have shown you he is one of the best around at photographing cars and a polite enquiry might have yielded some very useful help.
Still don't know who he is ... his intro is so crap that wouldn't give him this thousands of dollars worth job!
... and yes, that was a polite message that I posted.
Quote: Still don't know who he is ... his intro is so crap that wouldn't give him this thousands of dollars worth job!
before you start abusing regular members might be an idea to check people out first, as has been said before Mike could have been one of the best people to help you but given your response and your attitude I wouldn't blame him or others for not bothering.
Quote: Quote:Still don't know who he is ... his intro is so crap that wouldn't give him this thousands of dollars worth job!before you start abusing regular members might be an idea to check people out first, as has been said before Mike could have been one of the best people to help you but given your response and your attitude I wouldn't blame him or others for not bothering.
All I was asking for some advice. Could anyone tell what i can take out of this:
Seems like a complete waste of money to me ...
Continuous lighting is a possibility - cars don't move and so long shutter speeds are theoretically OK, although digital noise can be a real problem if the exposures are too long (I'm assuming that you're shooting on digital).
But continuous lighting lacks power even at short distances, unless you spend an absolute fortune on lighting designed for film sets, and when it has to travel to a reflector, some is absorbed by the reflector and the rest is dispersed over a wide area and has to travel back down anyway, you'll find yourself ending up with very, very little lighting power. Apart from long exposures you'll probably end up unable to overwhelm the ambient (existing) light.
So I strongly recommend flash. I would think a minimum of 4 x Elinchrom or equivalent 2,400J generators, each powering 1 head fitted with their high intensity reflector, which will control the spread of light and maximise its power. You may in fact need 6.
Car photography isn't just about a large diffused overhead light source, you'll need other lights too, to put light where it's needed on wheels etc and to create specular highlights when required, so say another 3 generators for that, although they could be less powerful than the ones needed for the bounce it makes sense to get them all the same, which increases versatility. The probably a spotlight attachment and certainly some narrow angle honeycombs, 5 deg ones are usually OK but you may need a 3 deg one too.
Obviously this won't be cheap and it won't guarantee professional results, you'll have a very steep learning curve to photograph cars well ![]()
An obvious alternative is the one that Mike Otley suggested, hire a pro - but not all pro commercial photographers have either the necessary skills or equipment for this type of photography.
I'm not an expert on video but I would have thought that the modelling lights from the flash would do the job - with the caveat that you can't use the modelling lamps when the flash heads are used with spotlights and narrow angle honeycombs, the loud bangs that result from overheating are expensive and a bit final...
Hope this helps
Let me qualify the statement friend. I am also in the motor trade and - based on what you've said in your opening post -
Quote: Seems like a complete waste of money to me ...
is MY personal - and valid - appraisal as I view going to this expense to photograph second-hand cars is not commercially viable.
So you have been 'lumbered' with the job 'cos the other person left. Rethink the brief and represent it to your management... and take a chill-pill friend.
BTW - 'Ego's' don't last five minutes here ![]()
Judging by the use of the word 'automobiles' I guess you are in the US.
Whether a professional studio is worth setting up for used cars probably depends on the makes / models and the local market for them.
If you are photographing quality cars, then it may be necessary to produce professional studio images.
One photographer featured on the Strobist blog manages to produce stunning car photography using Nikon or Canon speedlights.
Studio images of cars were often done in the UK by bouncing continuous light off coves, flats ( large reflectors ) and floating ceilings in the days of 5x4 and 10x8 film.
Studios I worked in used flash bounced off reflectors as they did not possess continuous lighting - and we only shot very few cars.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
















