Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

What makes a good panoramic image?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    kit-monster
    kit-monster e2 Member 103685 forum postskit-monster vcard Singapore2 Constructive Critique Points
    14 May 2008 - 1:43 PM

    I've recently been taking multiple images and stitching to create panoramic images and really enjoying the results. But what makes a good panoramic image? What are the rules of composition or are they the same for any image? Do very wide panoramic images have to tell a story or be read from left to right?

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    14 May 2008 - 1:43 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    culturedcanvas
    14 May 2008 - 1:48 PM

    One of the msot important aspects for me is being able to use elements to take the viewer on a journey through the shot. I dont think they have to tell a story as such and panoramics can make use of many of your traditional compositional tools that are used on other fomats.

    Natural frames are something I often use in valley panos with barns and cottages being framed as a starting point by trees which then allows the viewer to be interested enough to go further through the shot.

    Wide gaps and little or no information dont work unless the idea is to provide a sense of scale and locale.

    culturedcanvas
    14 May 2008 - 1:56 PM

    Another good point is to think about using the distortion that you will inevitably experience to good effect ... especially in images involving verticals such as buildings. Dont be afraid of ghosting either in interior shots where there are numerous people but try to avoid it in less crowded situations ....

    DaveU
    DaveU e2 Member 81339 forum postsDaveU vcard England121 Constructive Critique Points
    14 May 2008 - 1:59 PM

    An interesting question. I'm just wondering what difference it makes whether the pano is viewed on screen or hanging on a wall. On screen you can only scroll sequentially so you see the content in a certain predefined sequence whereas hung on a wall your eye can pretty much see the whole thing and/or flick from point to point at random.

    kit-monster
    kit-monster e2 Member 103685 forum postskit-monster vcard Singapore2 Constructive Critique Points
    14 May 2008 - 2:19 PM

    Good point about on screen. I print 95% of my pano's but so far have only loaded one up to a web site. Even with 24"+ the screen is a poor place to view pano shots. I think this is reflected here. I've been looking through the pano gallery and it appears as though excellent images are generally looked over. As a mountaineer I've always been drawn to Colin Prior's work. I don't want to belittle his work but some of his success must be down to the very wide format he uses.

    I've just processed my first pano from the weekend in Yorkshire. I deliberately tried to work with rule of thirds, foreground interest and added in a bit of story telling. The initially run looks good. If the processed image is a success I'll upload it.

    culturedcanvas
    14 May 2008 - 2:43 PM

    I for one will look forward to seeing it. I agree about Colin Priors work but creating good panos is as hard as any other shot ... good panos look impressive .. then again good shots of any format do!

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.