Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

What's Your Opinion of These Photos?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    StrayCat
    StrayCat e2 Member 1014686 forum postsStrayCat vcard Canada2 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Nov 2012 - 7:02 PM

    National Geographic Channel. There are some good links on the page also. Enjoy.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    17 Nov 2012 - 7:02 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    mohikan22
    mohikan22  102187 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Nov 2012 - 7:36 PM

    Ive seen some better ones here on EPZ...
    especially the snakes. Angi Nelson has MUCH better snake shots imo!

    the giraffe, well a PAS at a safari park will be a very similar result...
    the penguins are out of focus....

    Last Modified By mohikan22 at 17 Nov 2012 - 7:39 PM
    User_Removed
    17 Nov 2012 - 8:08 PM

    I agree...

    StrayCat
    StrayCat e2 Member 1014686 forum postsStrayCat vcard Canada2 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Nov 2012 - 8:38 PM

    That's what I see. I was kind of confused when I first looked at them. Imo, they may not be chosen for their IQ, but more for the unusual subject matter?

    User_Removed
    17 Nov 2012 - 9:28 PM

    It's 'The Branding' m'man!

    You've been 'caught'!

    "It's been accepted by 'National Geographic'!!! S'gotta be 'the best'!!

    Nope.

    Wink

    GarethRobinson
    GarethRobinson e2 Member 8979 forum postsGarethRobinson vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Nov 2012 - 10:15 PM

    The snakes are wild and living in the wild that makes things alot harder. I do agree there is better images on epz at times.

    MacroMeister
    18 Nov 2012 - 6:51 AM

    I have just subscribed to National geographic Magazine (special offer) as I have always been impressed by the photos. The latest issue for example has some spectacular shots of Antarctica.

    If you look at the picture credits in the link you posted you will see there is a mixture of sources - or at least there seems to be. The bear shot, for example is Mark Emery / NGT, while the first snake shot seems to be from a video. You can't expect the same level of technical finish if it's taken from a video. I'd say the the NG still images in the magazine are superb. The TV channel I don't know about as I've never seen it, but if still images are taken from video they almost certainly won't be as good as original camera stills.

    rhol2
    rhol2 e2 Member 3287 forum postsrhol2 vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Nov 2012 - 7:55 AM


    Quote: That's what I see. I was kind of confused when I first looked at them. Imo, they may not be chosen for their IQ, but more for the unusual subject matter?

    I agree, they seem to be chosen from various sources for their subject matter, rather than out and out technical quality..IMO most of the examples are effective in their way...

    StrayCat
    StrayCat e2 Member 1014686 forum postsStrayCat vcard Canada2 Constructive Critique Points
    20 Nov 2012 - 7:32 PM


    Quote: I'd say the the NG still images in the magazine are superb.

    I agree wholeheartedly, I've been viewing them since I was a child. Incidentally, did you know that you can get every copy of National Geographic ever issued, including all the photos, on DVD from their online store. It's listed in their Christmas catalogue for a reduced price.Smile

    Denny

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.