Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Whats best? 28mm or 18-55.....

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    johnnyboy114
    21 Nov 2008 - 9:13 AM

    Hi again

    I have the chance to buy a 28mm 2.8 wide angle lens, which is supposed to be really rather good for landscapes. Problem is, I don't really get what advantage over my 18-55mm kit lens this would have at its 18mm point. Ok, the f stops would be bigger on the prime lens, but when doing landscapes, I guess this becomes less of an issue as you want a small f stop for large depth of field....

    What advantage would I have with a prime 28mm lens over the 18-55mm and is it worth me buying it? I have no images to make a comparison unfortunately......

    Any info would be good info...

    Cheers guys

    John

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    21 Nov 2008 - 9:13 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    conrad
    conrad e2 Member 910870 forum postsconrad vcard 116 Constructive Critique Points
    21 Nov 2008 - 9:41 AM

    You're asking some really good and valid questions about this lens, especially since you want to use it as a landscape lens. Your idea that wider apertures won't help you shoot landscapes is correct. And I would like to add to that the fact that 28mm isn't very wide, especially on a camera with a cropped sensor, which, as I understand it, yours is. Your 18-55mm lens is much wider than this 28mm, so it will give you much wider and deeper views than the 28mm.

    If I were you, I'd buy the 28mm if I had other purposes in mind, like taking photographs inside or in low light conditions with a wide aperture.

    The comment that the 28mm "is supposed to be really rather good" probably applies more to the image quality than its other characteristics, since primes often have better quality than zooms - and especially kit zoom lenses.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    GreyMoonRising
    21 Nov 2008 - 10:06 AM

    Hi johnnyboy, I use 28mm when I can but your other alternative would be of more use, also are you using film or digital? as the focal length changes as you know. The 28mm would become more like 35mm? on digital approx.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    johnnyboy114
    21 Nov 2008 - 10:21 AM


    Quote: You're asking some really good and valid questions about this lens, especially since you want to use it as a landscape lens. Your idea that wider apertures won't help you shoot landscapes is correct. And I would like to add to that the fact that 28mm isn't very wide, especially on a camera with a cropped sensor, which, as I understand it, yours is. Your 18-55mm lens is much wider than this 28mm, so it will give you much wider and deeper views than the 28mm.

    If I were you, I'd buy the 28mm if I had other purposes in mind, like taking photographs inside or in low light conditions with a wide aperture.

    The comment that the 28mm "is supposed to be really rather good" probably applies more to the image quality than its other characteristics, since primes often have better quality than zooms - and especially kit zoom lenses.

    Thanks for your helpful insight Conrad. I had a feeling this would be the case to be honest. I think I will stick to the 18-55 for the time being and then save up and get a Sigma 10-20 for landscapes as that would seem more like the thing for digital photos. And yes, when I said the lens was supposed to be very good, I was referring to the image quality. Sorry I didn't make that too clear.

    Right, thats given me food for thought! Glad I asked now as I nearly handed over the money! lol!!

    Cheers

    John

    johnnyboy114
    21 Nov 2008 - 10:23 AM


    Quote: Hi johnnyboy, I use 28mm when I can but your other alternative would be of more use, also are you using film or digital? as the focal length changes as you know. The 28mm would become more like 35mm? on digital approx.

    Hiya,

    Yeah, I am using digital and was aware that the focal length would actually be slightly longer, hence my original question became more pertinent I guess. So with your info and Conrads, I have decided against the 28mm and wait till I can afford the Sigma 10-20mm that everyone raves about as that should be for digital and be worth the wait!

    Thanks again!

    John

    GreyMoonRising
    21 Nov 2008 - 12:01 PM

    money saved simply by asking questions...good stuff!

    Peter

    Last Modified By GreyMoonRising at 21 Nov 2008 - 12:04 PM
    johnnyboy114
    21 Nov 2008 - 12:22 PM


    Quote: Money saved simply by asking questions...good stuff!

    Peter

    Smile

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.