Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Which 70-200 f2.8 for Canon 7D

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    chataigner
    28 Dec 2012 - 5:10 PM

    I'm about to order my 7D and a 70-200 f2.8 to go with it. The budget of around 1k (for the lens) will cover the Tamron or Sigma stabilised, or the Canon unstabilised. Would welcome some advice. Use will be mainly events such as concerts and sports.

    Walkabout lens is the Canon EF 24-85 f3.5 that I've had for a very long time.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    28 Dec 2012 - 5:10 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    ikett
    ikett  4351 forum posts England
    28 Dec 2012 - 5:39 PM

    I borrowed a Sigma non IS when my Canon IS mkI was in for repair, I was not happy with the IQ, very soft and lacking contrast, the lens was the early version and may have been faulty but the owner sald it was spot on.

    The 7D may show up your 24-85, it dates back to the film era and was rated average on the 350D by Photozone review here.

    I would look at a better walk round lens first, the 7D is an awesome machine that needs good glass.

    robthecamman
    28 Dec 2012 - 7:21 PM

    iv the 7d just got the 15/85 lens seems good to me Smile

    losbarbados
    28 Dec 2012 - 8:38 PM

    Canon non IS without a doubt.

    If you haven't used anything else, then the Sigma is ok, but when you see the difference in IQ you will always ask yourself why you wasted your money.

    Clogs
    Clogs  6 United Kingdom
    29 Dec 2012 - 9:48 AM

    Sport Non IS is probably OK
    Concerts IS is a must

    The IQ of my Sigma 70-200 f2.8 is better then any of my 3 L series lenses.

    By the way why 7D? I would have a long hard look at the low light performance before parting with my money.
    have a look here: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cameras/Camera-Sensor-Ratings/(type)/usecase_sports

    tpfkapm
    tpfkapm  3142 forum posts United Kingdom
    29 Dec 2012 - 12:32 PM

    7d- better low light performance than 40d, 50d
    great fast autofocus
    sigma 70 200 good iq, and sharp- when it focuses- but unless recent models are more reliable i would say that the
    70 200 L is great lens and only bettered by the mk 2L IS, and both have reliable focus

    used and had all above

    tpfkapm
    tpfkapm  3142 forum posts United Kingdom
    29 Dec 2012 - 12:32 PM

    to clogs- which L lenses?

    SteveHunter
    29 Dec 2012 - 1:18 PM


    Quote: I'm about to order my 7D and a 70-200 f2.8 to go with it. The budget of around 1k (for the lens) will cover the Tamron or Sigma stabilised, or the Canon unstabilised. Would welcome some advice. Use will be mainly events such as concerts and sports.

    Walkabout lens is the Canon EF 24-85 f3.5 that I've had for a very long time.

    What is it that you plan on using the 70 - 200 for, that will determine whether you are better off getting IS or not, or even whether you need the f2.8 version. It's a heavy beast which often means it gets left at home.

    I would be looking to replace your walkabout lens first though, as there is little point buying a 7D and using that lens, you would be better off with a cheaper body and a better lens, unless you are specifically needing the low light and improved focussing capabilities of the 7D

    Coast
    Coast Critique Team 61169 forum postsCoast vcard United Kingdom292 Constructive Critique Points
    29 Dec 2012 - 4:04 PM

    I would always recommend investing in the best glass you can afford. Have you thought of used? I note a couple of local camera shops to me (Chester) are selling the Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS Mk I lens for a little over 1k. They may even barter a little for a sale! I have the Mk1 IS version. IQ is first class and having tried a friends MK II on my 5D MkIII I see no discernible difference in image quality between the two lenses. Where the Mk II scores over the original lens is speed in AF which is noticeably quicker.

    Both are heavy lenses but carried in a case fit for purpose I don't notice it even on full day hikes. I used to use a lowepro slingshot and the weight of the lens soon became a noticable pain but since switching to a Tamrac adventure rucksack style case I do not experience the same problem.

    For me the Canon L glass is worth the investment and has seen me through to my third EOS camera body now (20D, 5D MkI and now 5D Mk III).

    In answer to the IS question. For handheld shots it is invaluable. Just remember to switch it off when camera and lens are mounted on a tripod.

    MrGoatsmilk
    29 Dec 2012 - 4:30 PM

    I'm very pleased with my sigma 70-200 f2.8 non OS used it on both my 40D and 5D mkII, have a few shots in my portfolio. I picked it up used for 430 inc a x2 all in great condition too.

    ianrobinson
    ianrobinson e2 Member 41107 forum postsianrobinson vcard United Kingdom8 Constructive Critique Points
    30 Dec 2012 - 12:03 AM

    canon non is all the way and the 7d demands good glass as it is in itself a good camera.
    good glass will always be 1st in my camera bag....

    Clogs
    Clogs  6 United Kingdom
    30 Dec 2012 - 1:19 PM

    to tpfcapm 17-40, 24-105 and 100-400
    If I could spend my money again I would not buy the first two but invest in a 24-70 instead

    chataigner
    30 Dec 2012 - 5:16 PM


    Quote: I'm about to order my 7D and a 70-200 f2.8 to go with it. The budget of around 1k (for the lens) will cover the Tamron or Sigma stabilised, or the Canon unstabilised. Would welcome some advice. Use will be mainly events such as concerts and sports.

    Walkabout lens is the Canon EF 24-85 f3.5 that I've had for a very long time.

    What is it that you plan on using the 70 - 200 for, that will determine whether you are better off getting IS or not, or even whether you need the f2.8 version. It's a heavy beast which often means it gets left at home.

    I would be looking to replace your walkabout lens first though, as there is little point buying a 7D and using that lens, you would be better off with a cheaper body and a better lens, unless you are specifically needing the low light and improved focussing capabilities of the 7D

    Interesting point... I really like the flexibility etc. of the 24-85. What do you suggest as a replacement (assuming I also buy a 70-200) ?

    Johno450
    Johno450  3 United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Jan 2013 - 2:45 PM

    A difficult choice to make based on your budget... but I use a 7D and 70-200mm f2.8 L IS USM II and as Steve Hunter says it is a heavy combination... but the combined camera lens combo is hard to beat Smile

    Paul_Anthony
    7 Jan 2013 - 5:52 PM

    I use the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 and can not fault it, well made and fast focusing. A bit heavy but then so are most 70-200 f2.8 lenses. I do use it on a Nikon D600 though, but imagine that it will perform just as well on a 7D.

    Paul

    Last Modified By Paul_Anthony at 7 Jan 2013 - 5:52 PM
    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.