Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Sorry but here's another "which camera should I buy" thread.
I have been using medium format transparency film and then scanning it for shots of kitchen furniture to be reproduced in brochures and magazine advertisements. Having to send the film away for developing and scanning is time consuming and getting more expensive so I'm thinking of buying a DSLR.
I know nothing about what DSLR's are available so can anyone who has experience of various models suggest which one will produce sufficient quality for my needs?
I don't need to stick to any particular brand.
Thanks,
Peter
Pretty much any of the full frame DSLRs should meet your needs, Nikon D3X (D3 or D700 if you can live with the smaller megapixel counts), Canon 5d mkII or 1ds mkIII or Sony A850 or A900. Lenses and lighting systems will probably play an important part of your considerations.
IMO...you don't need a full frame camera if it's going into a brochure.
I think that it has to be the Nikon D3x - full frame format with 24 Mp sensor.
It is supposed to be "the best" dSLR for studio work and landscapes but it does not have the noiseless (comparatively) high-ISO benefits of the less expensive Nikon D3s
Quote: Thanks for the replies. From what I have been told, a Nikon D3000 or Canon 1000D is adequate but maybe with a better lens than the standard kit lens, but I haven't a clue. I don't want to spend money on a camera that is way better than what I need.
I'd have thought the D3000 or 1000D, good as they are, don't really have the quality for commercial work. But I guess it depends on your submission requirements, and whether they are ever likely to require the images for other advertising use. e.g if the image is to be used on a billboard a full frame or digital back for your RZ67 would probably be a better bet.
I would suggest most DSLR's would do the job just fine for 99% of product shots. Have done many if not hundreds on a D70 and D200 with 18-50 2.8 with no problem. I have only ever been asked to produce high res jpegs. I have never had a file size requested or for a particular camera to be used. Admittedly, all have either been used for labels, boxes, magazines etc though.
Quote: I think that it has to be the Nikon D3x - full frame format with 24 Mp sensor.
Seems totally over the top for the task in hand.
You may well be right. I took the "clue" from the fact that he is currently using medium format trannies - and to achieve anything like that quality from a dSLR would require something like the D3x. But if medium format trannies are, themselves, "over the top for the task" then a lower quality digital file would suffice.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.

















