Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Which is better? Fightttt!!!


21 Jan 2010 3:41PM
I have been using a Sony Alpha 75-300 lens but lucky enough to have been given a Minolta 100-300mm zoom that just oozes quality to the point where I am thinking of ditching the Sony lens. Is this wise?

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Overread e2
6 3.9k 18 England
21 Jan 2010 3:47PM
First off - I am darn jealous of your wolfshots lovely animals and shots - was it a wild encounter or an enclosure?

As to the lenses if you find the 100-300mm is giving you higher quality image results than your 75-300mm and the 100-300mm works in all regards on your camera then by all means ditch the worse lens and use the other.
Pete e2
13 18.7k 96 England
21 Jan 2010 3:53PM
You're in a perfect position to find out for yourself. Stick a newspaper on the wall...set the lens up parallel to the wall and photograph it at wide middle and long end of the zoom range shooting at all apertures and compare each...the better lens will have more detail in the edges and the white of the paper will be the same tone right into the edges.
Also try pointing into the sun to see which is best for flare.
PeterBee 8 35 5 United Kingdom
21 Jan 2010 4:01PM
As well as carrying out your own test, you might find that the lens reviews to be found at www.dyxum.com are helpful to your decision making process.
RichardN00 8 430 1 United Kingdom
21 Jan 2010 4:35PM

Quote:set the lens up parallel to the wall
???

Methinks you mean 90 Degrees to the wall Smile
cameracat 11 8.6k 61 Norfolk Island
21 Jan 2010 5:27PM

Quote:that just oozes quality to the point


To the point of what exactly...?

Are we talking optical quality, Or the build quality?

Surely the answer is keep the lens, That produces the best images.

Simples....Wink


Quote:I am darn jealous of your wolfshots


Nice for sure, But none of them have been produced with the Minolta lens.

A couple from a Sigma 600mm, Quite nice but a tad over sharpened perhaps, And a couple from the Sony lens with a convertor, Also quite nice...!!!
timbo e2
12 592 United Kingdom
21 Jan 2010 5:34PM

Quote:Also try pointing into the sun to see which is best for flare.


Are you really advocating pointing a telephoto lens at the sun Pete?
Burnt retinas here we come.
21 Jan 2010 7:45PM

Quote:Quote:


A couple from a Sigma 600mm, Quite nice but a tad over sharpened perhaps



I forgot to mention I had the iso setting at 1600 giving a slightly grainy effect. Not a result of over-sharpening
Freefall e2
11 675 United Kingdom
22 Jan 2010 10:03AM
When in doubt I always search for truly impartial judgement Wink
22 Jan 2010 11:14AM
Ha Ha love it!!
22 Jan 2010 11:38AM
Burp...!!! Smile
tigertimb 7 40 66 United Kingdom
2 Mar 2010 10:03AM
Obviously ought to take into account size and weight too, maximum aperture and how well it actually performs when wide open.
I have a lot of the older Minolta lenses which are often superb for basic quality and IQ, but they're unlikely to have modern digital coatings which means more colour abberations (and extensively at wide apertures), they tend to have longer minimum focus distances and they're unlikely to have the 'D' functionality to register focus distance and help with flash use.
And be careful when you check dyxum.com; from memory they made several 100-300mm lenses, and one of them was considerably better than the others.
Tim
dwilkin e2
8 24.3k United Kingdom
18 Mar 2010 5:11PM
Have to agree with Tim - if it's the lens they call the 'big beercan' absolutely go for it!

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.