Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

which is better for macro?

Forums > Lenses > which is better for macro?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    StrayCat
    StrayCat (e2 Member)
    9
    13271 forum postsStrayCat vcard Canada2 Constructive Critique Points
    31 Mar 2012 - 6:10 AM
    0

    Look them up on bhphoto,com Terry, and check the specs, that's what I do. I wouldn't pay for the anti-shake system on the Sigma 150, it doubles the price of the lens. I bought a new 150 on ebay last year for $450.00; it comes with a tripod collar and hood, and it's a great lens. I think the min focus is 11 inches; it's also a good general purpose f2.8 lens. A bit heavy on a Canon 40D for me, I spent 3.5 hours in a park with it one day, walking, and it was uncomfortable. I'd certainly buy it again if I was serious about macro, it's built like a tank, as they say.Grin

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    31 Mar 2012 - 6:10 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.