Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Which len Sigma 50-150 or nikon 18-200?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    Sandgrouse
    Sandgrouse e2 Member 7407 forum postsSandgrouse vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    21 May 2009 - 8:33 PM

    I recently broke another lens, leaving me only with my 10-20 sigma. I mainly take landscape and general everyday shots and use a Nikon D80. I donít really want to spend more than £550(ish) and this is realistically the only lens i will be able to afford to buy for the next year.

    I was thinking about the Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 G AF-S DX VR Lens or the Sigma 50-150mm f2.8 EX DC II HSM Lens.

    My concerns are that the 18-200 may not be fast and not sure how sharp it will be at 200, my concerns about the 50-150 are how much i may miss the 20-50 range.

    I would like people views on which would be the best lens for me, if anyone has either len how do you rate it or is there another lens which will be better for me.

    Thanks, looks like it may be a good sunset so heading to my local loch.

    Cheers Rick

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    21 May 2009 - 8:33 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    scottishphototours

    Have seen lots of good press for the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 - have no experience of it or the others you mention though...

    G73photography
    21 May 2009 - 9:36 PM

    i have the 50-150, got it from focus in jan for about 430, its a good lens, but think it wouldnt really suit your needs due to the range, the f2.8 is fast and feels solid but heavy, tamron do a 18-270 mm lens if thats any better , G

    KevinEllison
    KevinEllison e2 Member 72507 forum postsKevinEllison vcard England
    21 May 2009 - 9:37 PM

    A firm favourite of mine now for general use Nikons newish 16-85

    Less costly 18-70 something of a "mistake" by Nikon..??! offered some time back as a 'kit' lens with D70 and D50 and actually has proven to be damned good...(now my daughter has nicked it...)

    ...and for the upper end..

    A dark horse from Sigma 70-300
    Used to use this some time back, surprisingly good quality feel and excellent performance quite frankly, belies its price..

    Sezz
    Sezz e2 Member 9617 forum postsSezz vcard England15 Constructive Critique Points
    21 May 2009 - 9:46 PM

    I agree with Kevin, the Nikkor 16-85 VR is an excellent lens, sharper in my opinion than the 18-200 VR. The 18-200 has had a bit of bad press lately but I have to say I have had no problem with mine and find it a good versatile lens.

    S Smile

    Sandgrouse
    Sandgrouse e2 Member 7407 forum postsSandgrouse vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    21 May 2009 - 11:00 PM

    Cheers for the comments any more views?

    dcash29
    dcash29  81908 forum posts England
    21 May 2009 - 11:49 PM

    I had a bit of a play with a mates D300+ the nikon lens seems very good to me and focuses easily in low light

    FatHandedChap
    22 May 2009 - 9:12 AM

    I've got a 50-150, it's a great lens. Managed to find a second hand one for £300.

    If I'm travelling light then I just take a 10-20 and the 50-150, can't say I miss the 20-50 range - just means a bit of walking!

    wamp
    wamp  8276 forum posts England8 Constructive Critique Points
    22 May 2009 - 11:47 AM


    Quote: My concerns are that the 18-200 may not be fast and not sure how sharp it will be at 200

    Like Sarah, I've had no issues with mine at all. It been a great lens and the range is great. I've only used this lens as my main lens (landscapes excluded) for the last couple of years and I've never had an issue once with it. The VR comes in quite handy too.


    Quote: 20-50 range - just means a bit of walking

    Only if there's space to walk backwards far enough to get what you want in the shot! Wink

    The 150-200 however, doesn't seem a lot, but certainly very handy.

    Cheers, Sean

    Last Modified By wamp at 22 May 2009 - 11:50 AM
    Sandgrouse
    Sandgrouse e2 Member 7407 forum postsSandgrouse vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    22 May 2009 - 11:22 PM

    Thanks for all the comments, going to go for the 18-200

    Cheers Rick

    strawman
    strawman  1022010 forum posts United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
    22 May 2009 - 11:31 PM

    Ok my 2p, of the 3 people I know who have the 18-200, two had to send it back within 6 months, and they no longer have it. One the dealer gave a cash refund on as it and camera went back for the 3rd time, the other was sold, but only after a battle to get Nikon to repair it.

    Both think the 18-70 kit lens and 70-300 Vr lens from Nikon are better.

    the 3rd person still uses it, but only when they are travelling light.

    I would look at other Nikon lenses before that one. Optically the 18-200 did not look that special, but then super zooms are never going to be the best. Its not a disaster, but when you look at the price you have to wonder.

    Last Modified By strawman at 22 May 2009 - 11:34 PM
    Melcatfish
    23 May 2009 - 3:36 PM


    Quote: Ok my 2p, of the 3 people I know who have the 18-200, two had to send it back within 6 months, and they no longer have it. One the dealer gave a cash refund on as it and camera went back for the 3rd time, the other was sold, but only after a battle to get Nikon to repair it.

    Both think the 18-70 kit lens and 70-300 Vr lens from Nikon are better.

    the 3rd person still uses it, but only when they are travelling light.

    I would look at other Nikon lenses before that one. Optically the 18-200 did not look that special, but then super zooms are never going to be the best. Its not a disaster, but when you look at the price you have to wonder.

    Just reading this, I hope that the one I bought this morning is from the good batch!

    Mel
    x

    riprap007
    riprap007  101568 forum posts England37 Constructive Critique Points
    23 May 2009 - 4:57 PM

    If you treat the 18-200 as an 18 - 180 then it is fine, makes for a good travel lens

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.