0

Which lens for wedding photography

Forums > Lenses > Which lens for wedding photography

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last
    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:18 AM
    0

    Hello all!

    At a recent wedding exhibition, I was chatting with a fellow photographer who recommended that I get myself a Tamron 18-200mm lens for my canon 350D.
    The reason being is that I'm soon going to go out with a professional photographer and start learning the trade of wedding photography with a view to eventually going out myself(to earn myself some extra money at the weekends!)

    I've been having a look round and so far have found:

    Tamron AF 18-200mm DI II f3.5-6.3 (which he recommended)
    Or
    Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 DC

    the question I have is simple:

    which of these two would be best?


    thanks guys and gals.
    AndyR

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:18 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Chris_H
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:23 AM
    0

    Neither both would be crap for weddings, both are far too slow.
    You need the extra speed in churches where it is dark and a lot of the time you are not allowed to use flash.

    Chris

    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:27 AM
    0

    ohh! ok, thanks for the reply chris


    any recommendations for what would be a good lens? anyone? Smile

    Chris_H
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:29 AM
    0

    Canon 24-70mm 2.8 is a good wedding lens, if you cant afford that then you can pick up a Canon 28-70mm 2.8 L secondhand for a much cheaper price, I have never used the 28-70mm, its the lens the 24-70mm replaced.
    If you cant afford one of the canon lenses then you could go for a Sigma 2.8 version.
    Without the extra speed you will miss important shots, not just indoor shots but with winter weddings it can also be dark outside very early, while you can use flash you want to try and work with the ambient light as best as you can if not the background will be very dark.

    Chris

    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:32 AM
    0

    many thanks for your advice Chris - sadly I dont think i can afford what you're recommending, would a Tamron or Sigma 24-70mm or 28-75mm lens be a) cheaper and b) sufficient?

    Chris_H
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:37 AM
    0

    Never used either the sigma or the tamron and I do not know of anyone who has used one personally, but they both sound much better options and than what you were recomended.
    Do you know the pro you are assisting, I assist a pro in wedding photography and he supplies evrything I need.

    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:44 AM
    0

    Yep I know him reasonably well, havent had a chance to go out to a wedding with him as yet so i'm unsure about whether or not he would provide me with necessary kit. I was actually hoping to get my own equipment, I get the impression that he would like me to try and take an independent role in assisting him to eventually take on the weddings by myself!

    (thank you very much for your advice by the way chris, I appreciate the fact that you know what your'e talking about when it comes to weddings (just read your profile) so your advice is invaluable!)


    could you tell me would this be a good choice? :

    http://www.warehouseexpress.com/photo/lenstech/sigma/28105f284asp.html

    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:46 AM
    0

    or alternatively:
    http://www.warehouseexpress.com/photo/lenstech/tamron/2875f28.html

    Chris_H
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:54 AM
    0

    I would go for the tamron over the first one, the first one is still too slow for the zoom shots and at weddings you may need to use the longer end of the lens a lot in the church.

    Chris

    peterjones
    27 Oct 2005 - 9:59 AM
    0

    Andy,

    In my bag I have :

    12/24 F3.5/4.5 Sigma
    28/70 F2.8L Canon
    70/200 F2.8L Canon
    50mm F1.8 Canon
    about to purchase Macro 100mm F2.8 Canon


    I use the 50mm more and more, it is a very versatile lens.

    I don't know much about your lens but I personally don't like a very long zoom ratio.

    Hope you enjoy the experience with your wedding pro.

    And WE are excellent suppliers I use them now for all my hardware.

    Rgds Peter.

    andyr
    7
    37 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 10:27 AM
    0

    many thanks for your advice guys, much appreciated.


    I use the 50mm f1.8 a hell of a lot and its the lens that spends the most time attached to my camera, didnt think it would be suitable for wedding photos, but I may have a chance to try...


    may well go for the tamron (its the only fast lens with a little bit of flexibility (zoom-wise) that I can seem to afford)

    leeg
    8
    165 forum posts
    27 Oct 2005 - 10:43 AM
    0

    I took some snaps at a wedding recently using my canon 70-200 f4 lens. Great lens but again, as previously mentioned, too slow. The f2.8 in my opinion is a must. F4 would be fine outside when the sun is shining. If it's not, which in the UK is pretty likely!! then the 2.8 will come into it's own. Something I guess you find out from experience... the 70-200 has excellent range for candid stuff etc and a 50mm f1.4 etc is also needed. You only get one chance at a wedding!! something I've steered clear of :o)

    abel
    7
    518 forum posts United Kingdom
    27 Oct 2005 - 10:58 AM
    0

    I use:-

    Nikkor 50mm f1.8
    Nikkor 85mm f1.8
    Sigma 70-200mm EX HSM f2.8

    The only one that doesn't come out of the bag during the day is the otherwise excellent 18-70mm kit lens, but that does tend to come out to play a lot during the evening on the dance floor, along with its pal the SB-800 flash :O)

    The 50mm f1.8 will stand you in good stead, although I appreciate you will need different focal lengths as the day progresses.

    Get the fastest lenses you can afford.

    I take it the guy you were chatting to at the wedding show wasn't the pro you're about to go out with? What has the pro got in his bag?

    nicanddi
    27 Oct 2005 - 11:36 AM
    0

    As mentioned above if you're shooting with Canon bodies the main wedding work-horse lenses are:

    24-70L F2.8
    70-200L F2.8 (some like the IS vesrion but having tried both we now use only the non IS version.)

    However, also in the case go a 105mm f2.8 macro (this time a third party lens from Sigma because it's blo**dy good and makes another useful portrait lens.) Together with the 17-40L F4 (used with flash indoors it's fine,) which is useful for tight spaces and large groups and of course the 50mm F1.4 for low light situations indoors.

    Now some would argue that primes make sense as they can be even faster, however we're more than happy with quality of the Canon L zooms.

    The main advice we'd give anyone is that photos of someone's wedding are quite literally priceless. You can't go back and re-shoot them. They have to be shot right on the day in often difficult situations with 101 things going on at once.

    These images will be looked at by many people over the years so use the best glass you can afford to ensure you produce the best images you can from your equipment.

    Regards,

    Nic.

    peterjones
    27 Oct 2005 - 1:29 PM
    0

    Nic,

    Re your 70-200L F2.8 out of interest why do you prefer the non IS version; like you I have the non IS?

    Rgds Peter.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.