Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Hi...I'm still looking for a more ideal lens for shooting birds/wildlife/zoo animals and the like.
I presently have a Nikon D7000 and a Nikon 28-300 VR lens.
I've found that the Nikon 70-200 2.8 lens is much too heavy for me.
I'm not against changing to a Canon and wondered if anyone uses a Canon 70-200 non IS lens ? possibly with a 1.4 converter, which would give me a similar reach as my 28-300 lens but without the IS.
I ride a bike so it's not feasible for me to carry a tripod, I'm not looking for miracles just a reasonable chance of getting a decent shot at a reasonable distance.
...any advice appreciated....thanks....Mike
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
not feasable to VELCRO a tripod to ya bike.. I do. Pushbike that is. you can buy velcro ties (like zip ties)
I have used 70-200 F4 non IS with 1.4x before, works well, and very light.
I would have thought it was the 2.8 glass on either Canon or Nikon that is the cause of the weight.
The Canon 70-200mm F2.8L = 1310g
The Canon 70-200mm F2.8L IS mk2 = 1490g
The Canon 70-200mm F4L = 705g
The Canon 70-200mm F4L IS = 760g
I use the 70-200mm F4L IS - and it's no problem weight-wise.
Also works well with a 1.4tc.
I used to have a canon 70-200 f4 Non IS and it was a cracking lens. I sold it and bought the 2.8IS and now wish I had kept the f4 version because it was very light and produced very sharp images using shutter speeds of around 1/500. I think the f4 version is retailing for around £495 and at that price it's a real bargain (IMO).
I also ride a bike and have a carry pouch for the tripod and sling it across my shoulders.
...thanks guys...I'll have to keep thinking...not having a camera shop in Wakefield is a problem and makes buying a real difficulty.
Quote: I think the f4 version is retailing for around £495 and at that price it's a real bargain (IMO).
...could I expect better results with the f4 + 1.4 TC than with my present 28-300 VR Nikon.?
I have carried the tripod on my bike but not easy
I use the Mk1 70 -200 2.8 is version - I know when I purchased it I considered the non is but thought hell if I buy it I will always have wished I had gone with the IS version.
Moral I guess is buy the best and you'll have no regrets
here you are i used to have that combo & it was much sharper than the IS version that's why i sold the IS one & kept the non . i have sold both now & have the f/4 L IS very sharp combo indeed
Quote: I ride a bike so it's not feasible for me to carry a tripod
Carrying a tripod on a bike shouldn't pose a problem, in fact it's a lot easier than carrying it yourself, let the bike take the weight. I carry a big, hefty 5 series Gitzo on a bike all the time, no problem at all. Just use two or three elasticated bungees to secure it to a rear pannier rack.
Quote: Carrying a tripod on a bike shouldn't pose a problem,
...well it does for me justin....even useing a tripod presents a problem...you may well be a lot fitter/stronger/younger than I..you are without doubt a more capable cyclist/photographer...but for me it's a problem
I cannot handle the weight of the heavier 2.8 lenses...why I considered a non IS f4 but I doubt It'll be more beneficial than my 28-300 f3.5-5.6 Nikon so sadly I think I'll have to stick.
thanks again all.....Mike
Try a monopod
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar