Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Hi all..
Am a confirmed 1.6x crop factor Canon body user...I have one 350D body still going strong and one 1100D body purchased recently. My next purchase will be a 60D body. I'm looking for a high quality wide-angle EF-S lens (28-105mm equivalent) to go with the 60D, something that will be close to an L Series lens in terms of image resolution and build quality.
How does the 17-55mm f2.8 compare to the L Series 24-105mm other than being a bit shorter at both tele and wide ends?
It's a fantastic lens & much lighter than the 24-105. I had the 17-55mm for a year or so before I went to full frame & I loved it, it's a great walkabout lens which covered almost everything from landscapes to portraits. I had it on a Canon 450D which I took on a Med cruise visiting loads of places, I didn't need anything else. Here's one of the pics.
Thanks for the response, much appreciated! ![]()
Just wanted to know, what changed with respect to your photography that made you go full frame? I'm a sports photographer with a bad back which means I can't use heavy bodies and lenses though I tend to use the best quality lenses possible on my light bodies...the 1.6 factor helps too by making a 135mm f2 lens seem like a 200mm f2...
I now shoot weddings & live bands both of which pay me & both events often take place in dark venues. I wanted the best image quality for the weddings & best low light capability for the bands so the full frame was the way to go. I have lost a bit of reach because I no longer have the crop factor but If crop my photo I think I still get better quality with less noise.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.


It also took this image.







