Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

A burst of colour

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

I tried to show the complicated beauty of this rhododendron against a neutral background. I wonder if I should have included a stem or something to anchor it - looks to be floating in space or is the subdued background enough?

Geoff

Brand:Panasonic
Camera:
Lens:14
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:17 May 2010 - 2:54 PM
Focal Length:45mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/5.6
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/60sec
Exposure Comp:-0.66
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Program AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:Auto
Title:A burst of colour
Username:salopian salopian
Uploaded:22 Feb 2014 - 6:37 PM
Tags:Clive, Gardens, Wildlife / nature
VS Mode Rating 98 (0% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Modifications wanted Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
RonnieAG
RonnieAG e2 Member 4139 forum postsRonnieAG vcard Scotland112 Constructive Critique Points
23 Feb 2014 - 1:25 AM

It would be nearly always very difficult to include the stem when photographing rhododendron blooms, and I don't think including such would enhance the image in any way.
This would not apply to other flowers, e.g. a daffodil without a bit of stem would look pretty unnatural.
What you have here is a head filling the frame and captured in excellent detail (which surprises me given the aperture was f/5.6) and with it set against a non intrusive b/g........I can think of little that could enhance this shot.
R.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

paulbroad
paulbroad  782 forum posts United Kingdom863 Constructive Critique Points
23 Feb 2014 - 7:53 AM

Perfectly well done. No need for anything else. You have even got away with the wide aperture with all the flower heads being close to the focal plane. Whilst trivial, the problem for me is a frame almost full of exactly the same colour, which can be a bit over powering. Please, no one suggest mono for this one. Imagine the grey!

Paul

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pamelajean
pamelajean Critique Team 8799 forum postspamelajean vcard United Kingdom1623 Constructive Critique Points
23 Feb 2014 - 8:49 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

A beautiful rhododendron specimen, Geoff, with everything nice and sharp, which is never easy with a "circular" subject like this cluster, as the edges tend to fall out of focus.

The leaves are always close to the base of the cluster and it's rarely possible to show the stem of a rhododendron in your frame, so I see no problem with the flower "floating".

I would like to have seen the shiny green leaves, they are so large and architectural, and it's natural, as I have said, to see them at the base. I fully understand why you desaturated your background, to make the flower stand out, but for me the leaves are just as important as the flower in this case.

If it were mine, I would simply do something with the background that is NOT leaves. I would either completely blacken it, or give it an imported background either of sky or a gradient.

You have filled the frame beautifully, with no clipped petals, but the background dullness doesn't appeal to me.

Pamela.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

salopian
salopian e2 Member 2salopian vcard United Kingdom18 Constructive Critique Points
24 Feb 2014 - 10:53 AM

Thanks for the helpful comments which seem to point to the background as being the problem rather than the flower head being "detached". I shall enjoy trying out a green leafy background ( more colour Paul ) and probably a sky ( Pamela )

Geoff

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.