Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Amber Posing

Versions (Before and After)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

A new one but taken a few months ago, processed following a tutorial on psdbox.com
Amber loved this photo.

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 60D
Lens:EF24-105mm F/4L IS USM
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:28 Apr 2012 - 5:11 PM
Focal Length:35mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/4.0
Aperture:f/11.0
Shutter Speed:1/200sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:Off, Did not fire
White Balance:As Shot
Title:Amber Posing
Username:JackAllTog JackAllTog
Uploaded:6 Nov 2012 - 10:44 PM
Tags:Fashion, Portraits / people, Posing
VS Mode Rating 101 (66.67% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:18
Variant - Before/AfterVariant - Before and After

Comments

debu
debu  4 India
6 Nov 2012 - 11:04 PM

Lovely image and model.
debu

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Ayoob
Ayoob e2 Member 3Ayoob vcard Australia
6 Nov 2012 - 11:15 PM

Beautiful portrait image and lovely model .........Grin

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

andy p
andy p  10
7 Nov 2012 - 12:20 AM

Nice pose, razor sharp, good color.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Richsr
Richsr e2 Member 790 forum postsRichsr vcard England209 Constructive Critique Points
7 Nov 2012 - 9:09 AM

Not sure what you have done to her face Stuart, but for me it far better in the unprocessed version interms of shape and form.
Regards Richard

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

gonzalito
gonzalito e2 Member 4gonzalito vcard United Kingdom13 Constructive Critique Points
7 Nov 2012 - 9:57 AM

I have to agree with Richsr!

In V1, there is a strange shadow over her left eye (right, as you look at the photo) which makes it appear as if both eyes are looking towards different directions; V2 does not give me that impression.

Also, it appears that you have tried adding a bit of smile in V1 as well as changing the hair colour. However, V2 is just perfect for me - she is got gorgeous lips, beautiful big eyes and a nice body. Her original long hair color, is just perfect and fits well with her outfit. I would have probably preferred V2 on on a white background. V1 just doesn't do it for me.

Hopefully, my comments above are not too harsh; thing is, I know what you can do with the camera!
Bring it on mate!

Last Modified By gonzalito at 7 Nov 2012 - 9:58 AM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

JackAllTog
JackAllTog e2 Member 53627 forum postsJackAllTog vcard United Kingdom58 Constructive Critique Points
7 Nov 2012 - 10:55 AM

No comments ever too harsh Smile i have to agree with you both, I'm editing late at night on a laptop and learning PS6 features, here i've messed the the D&B grey overlay layer and put some shadows in the wring place. its still in editable layers so i can re- adjust Smile thanks.

I'd also took out blemishes, smoothed the skin and took out that crease in her trousers under her bum. brightened the image and seen the effects of adding a colour gradient.
Viewing in the daylight on the work monitor is a good check for me.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

rontear
rontear e2 Member 11rontear vcard England4 Constructive Critique Points
9 Nov 2012 - 12:51 PM

V2 for me Stuart, Amber looks more relaxed and confident.
Ron.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

arhb
arhb e2 Member 72273 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom68 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jan 2013 - 10:59 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I too prefer the original, but this is interesting Stuart, as it shows how you can manipulate an image to change the expression;
The dodging on her left cheek has created the impression that she is puffing her cheeks out, which is possibly not what you were trying to achieve?

One technique worth exploring, when doing a global(highlights/shadows/structure) dnb on the face, is primarily to use 'colour range' tool under the 'select' menu(use sampled colours from menu, dont check localised clusters, and set to selection option below image) -
Use the colour dropper to select the brightest area of skin, then move the fuzziness slider up to expose the naturally occurring highlights of the face.
You can either just make a visual note of these area, or make the selection.
Use a curves adjust layer to lift the highlights, after locking the shadows with a point on the curve.
Invert the layer mask and use a soft white brush to gently reveal the adjustment of the highlights.
Use the feather slider on the adjustment layer to tweak subtlety.

Repeat process with shadows.

This process will look better if you do a micro-level dnb to even out the smaller light/dark variations visible throughout the face, and although this is time consuming, gets quicker with practice.
Hope this helps.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10868 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2867 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jan 2013 - 4:09 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

The original is much better. The main issue for me with V2 is that youve tried to make her smile by pushing up the corners of her mouth, and its not effective. Its also out of step with her eyes, which are not laughing at all, which ends up a bit cartoonish. Lightening the face globally a little, leave the hair which suits her complexion and leaving aside the liquify tool would work. I agree with arhb that the effect on her cheeks makes her appear to be puffing, (or have Mumps!) and it also removes all detail from her skin

A click for V2



regards


Willie

Last Modified By banehawi at 6 Jan 2013 - 4:12 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

sitan1
sitan1  6490 forum posts United Kingdom
9 Jan 2013 - 12:00 PM

Love the pink background and an all round fab portrait.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

pandaphotography

V1 is awful, original is far better

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.