Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Barn owl

Versions (Before and After)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

Hi...this is another shot from the Bedford B o P centre.
....If it works this is a before and after sequence.
The first shot is the before....straight from the camera.
.....In the second pic. ....I've then tried to sharpen it...as per instuctions, not sure it worked Smile
.....but thanks for looking....Mike

Brand:NIKON CORPORATION
Camera:Nikon D3200 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:SIGMA APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:1 Jun 2013 - 11:53 AM
Focal Length:200mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/2.8
Aperture:f/5.6
Shutter Speed:1/1000sec
Exposure Comp:-2.0
ISO:800
Exposure Mode:Aperture-priority AE
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:No Flash
White Balance:Auto
Title:Barn owl
Username:MikeRC MikeRC
Uploaded:22 Jun 2013 - 10:45 PM
Tags:Barn owl, Bedford, Pets / captive animals
VS Mode Rating 102 (66.67% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:12
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Variant - Before/AfterVariant - Before and After

Comments

taggart
taggart e2 Member 1042 forum poststaggart vcard United States12 Constructive Critique Points
23 Jun 2013 - 1:21 AM

Excellent view!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

CarolG
CarolG e2 Member 7128 forum postsCarolG vcard Greece17 Constructive Critique Points
23 Jun 2013 - 6:16 AM

Such a handsome bird, Mike, very well captured. Carol

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

JuBarney
JuBarney e2 Member 3JuBarney vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
23 Jun 2013 - 1:35 PM

A lovely shot
Ju

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10868 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2867 Constructive Critique Points
23 Jun 2013 - 11:46 PM

Hi Mike.

Ive uploaded a mod, - one of a few Owls Ive done today, - but the first Barn Owl.

The basic image is underexposed, and its underexposed because you used -2 EC. Think about why you decided that. You were concerned the white of the owl would be overexposed, right? But think like a camera. The camera is seeing a lot of light coming in, with the centre a little brighter than the rest, so as its set to multi-segment, it will make a decision to even it all out, with some weight applied to the middle, which it will slightly underexpose, - or, perhaps expose correctly. You then tell it to underexpose whatever it sees by 2 full stops. Thats a LOT of light lost.

So step 1 is try the shot with no correction; check your histogram; and only then apply EC either + or -, and take the shot again. As a rule of thumb, if your subject is white and fills most of the frame, use positive, not negative EC.
So for a full frame white cat, use +1; and for a full frame black cat, use -1.

Then sharpening. Sharpening can only be successful when there are edges between pixels, where it works to increase contrast. In fact, contrast and sharpening are first cousins. And, to have edges, you need contrast, which is light from the side; and a lens capable of resolving fine line detail (high MTF scores)

In this shot, there are few edges, or detail on the breast. The only area that can be sharpened are the face, and the edge feathers. The Owl may have had some breeze flattening the chest. The use of a higher than needed ISO also contributes to lack of original sharpness, as noise is reduced by blurring. It seems that ISO 800 was the lowest you could go though, as using no EC would have moved the speed to 1/250.

Once exposure is corrected, you may notice that the white of the breast seems a little blue, - which is due to white balance, and white balance is affected by exposure.

The mod is also cropped to an 8 X 10 aspect ratio, with the Owl moved off centre. I can see some sharpening in V2, - very little, and I also had some difficulty with sharpening.


I hope this is helpful. If you have any questions, just ask.



regards



Willie

Last Modified By banehawi at 23 Jun 2013 - 11:46 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Mike_S
Mike_S  3 United Kingdom
25 Jun 2013 - 11:23 AM

Nice shot Mike. I think V2 is a little sharper.
Recently been to Bridlington B o P centre and tried some owl shots myself.
Not as easy as one might think.
I found the advice from Willie above most interesting and will
try to take those comments on board for myself.

Mike.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.