Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Blaenavon, graveyard

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

Looking for some gut feelings and honest responses - even if not flattering. Putting this on the critique gallery, even though I don't think it will have any exif data, so it may not be suitable. I really do want that feed back, though! Took the picture in infra red (ir converted digital camera), tried out a pseudo lith effect in Photoshop then imported it into Painter 11 and used several autopainting settings before bringing it back into Photoshop. In the end, although I did use 'auto' in Painter, there was quite a lot of work as nothing in PS was auto at all, and I had to be selective in Painter, too.

Is it cheating? Is it like, a machine made thing, or a person made thing? And, does anyone like it? I think I quite do, but then I just made it and I really should have waited a couple of days Smile

Lens:Nikon 24-70
Recording media:RAW (digital)
Title:Blaenavon, graveyard
Username:SueEley SueEley
Uploaded:6 Jul 2012 - 7:10 PM
Tags:Digital art, Digitally manipulated, Graveyard, Infra red, Landscape / travel, Mono b&w, Pseudo lith
VS Mode Rating 100 (42.86% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
gazlowe
gazlowe e2 Member 2gazlowe vcard United Kingdom
6 Jul 2012 - 7:19 PM

it works for me

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

NeilWigan
NeilWigan e2 Member 4NeilWigan vcard England15 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2012 - 7:49 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I think your title doesnt represent what you have created from your original photgraph,it indicates a record shot and that it isnt.People of a certain age think of graveyards as somewhere for peaceful meditation,your work /image has captured the darker side ,death is stark, dramatic and almost black and white ,depending on your beliefs.This sort of image splits the photography folks apart it is yours and if you are pleased with it then fight your corner .Personally i think it would benefit from something in the distance in the white area to the right of the crosses.A lot of work and well done.Automations dont matter every HDR or pano has been done by a program so long as the original photography is yours . Neil.

Last Modified By NeilWigan at 6 Jul 2012 - 7:53 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

SueEley
SueEley e2 Member 8271 forum postsSueEley vcard Wales96 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2012 - 8:10 PM

Thanks, Neil - I can see the space you are talking about and, yes, it would benefit from something! Sue

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Eviscera
Eviscera  81096 forum posts United Kingdom149 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2012 - 9:31 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Hi Sue

Perhaps you're missing the wood for the trees with all that pp !

Its a great background with no particular focal point and that's a good thing to use as a base layer sometimes.

It just about retains enough dof to draw the viewer in , and I do like the proportionality of the whites greys and blacks , a good wash of tones.

No , its not cheating , its imagination and wont appeal to the luddites but sod em.

What it does need is rotating horizontal (as its reading right to left ), and an added focal point that kinda gives the base a depth.

Like it. Mod slapped an idea

Last Modified By Eviscera at 6 Jul 2012 - 9:32 PM

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Tooth
Tooth  95772 forum posts Ireland227 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2012 - 9:33 PM

I think only you can decide whether you like it or not as shots like this tend to be very personal. I can see it as the antitheses of the peace and tranquility of a normal graveyeard scene, with rather visions of chaos and disruptoon, the other side of deathas it were.

Is it your own work? - well yes because you ocersaw and made the decisions at every stage of the process. Remember a paintbrush is made by a machine, but a painting isn't....

Stephen

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

SlowSong
SlowSong e2 Member 54168 forum postsSlowSong vcard England28 Constructive Critique Points
6 Jul 2012 - 11:40 PM

This has the look of a negative to me, although clearly it's not. It's very distinctive, and I can see a white cross in the background, right next to the stone cross, as if it's a reverse shadow. I like the hints of reddy brown which add depth. I like the brush strokes. The fact that you've produced something rather interesting would suggest to me that you've pulled it off. Whatever, it's original, and I like it.
Chris

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

tony64
tony64  10204 forum posts England9 Constructive Critique Points
7 Jul 2012 - 8:04 AM

Hi Sue, I echo Dave's comments above, I quite like it! Although for me there is too much white in the central portion of the picture, it needs a little bit more for interest, like Dave's bird!
It might just be suffering from a few too many processes! And for a good critique, why not upload all the different versions as you did them, including the original?
I also agree with you, give it a few days before uploading! At least sleep on it!
But, I'm pleased you did!
Tony

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

DP_Imagery
DP_Imagery e2 Member 9DP_Imagery vcard Wales6 Constructive Critique Points
7 Jul 2012 - 11:40 PM

I very much like it as it is - definitely not cheating to use all tools at your disposal to create the image you are after. It's about what is in the mind and how you transfer it to paper, pixels, canvas or whatever. I really like Dave's mod too - it does have that extra dimension. Title does need to reflect the pictorial nature of the image.

Bruce

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.