Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Bridgescape

Versions (Variants)Version Help

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

An effect that I have been meaning to have a go at since Walter (Gajewski) suggested it... Solarisation, combined with the long exposure, gives a great effect. Not something that I would normally try but we do have to step out of the box sometimes eh!

V2 a closer crop (which I think is actually my favourite).

Thanks as always to all those that c and c'd on yesterday's upload. Much appreciated!

Update: I've uploaded the original used for the conversion. As you can se it was a very dull, grey and very cold day with 100% cloud cover, which is sort of what I wanted, just needed more sea! Hope that helps Dave

Brand:Canon
Camera:Canon EOS 500D
Lens:EF-S10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Date Taken:25 Jan 2013 - 4:48 PM
Focal Length:10mm
Lens Max Aperture:f/4.4
Aperture:f/14.0
Shutter Speed:121sec
Exposure Comp:0.0
ISO:100
Exposure Mode:Manual
Metering Mode:Multi-segment
Flash:No Flash
Title:Bridgescape
Username:marktc marktc
Uploaded:26 Jan 2013 - 5:26 AM
Tags:Bridgescape, Landscape, Landscape / travel
VS Mode Rating 101 (100% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:45
Variant - TestsVariant - Tests

Comments

CarolG
CarolG e2 Member 7139 forum postsCarolG vcard Greece18 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 5:52 AM

Very effective result, Mark, and I think V.2 is my favourite, too. Carol

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

gajewski
gajewski e2 Member 10gajewski vcard United States9 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 6:42 AM

V2 for me as well Mark. I'm glad you stepped out of your comfort zone. As you know, solarisation can be a tricky process that works for only certain images. I think it works well here -- giving a strange dream-like glow.
-=\Walter

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

leontari
leontari e2 Member 2leontari vcard Greece
26 Jan 2013 - 6:45 AM

An effective image, very well captured. V2 for me too.
Effrossini

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Hermanus
Hermanus  2 South Africa
26 Jan 2013 - 6:46 AM

This is an excellent result of your experiment Mark !! I love both images to be honest Smile

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

fazzer
fazzer e2 Member 535 forum postsfazzer vcard United Kingdom6 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 6:47 AM

Beautiful shot ,great range of tones ,can't decide which version(edging towards v2) Smile
Jeremy

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

WhiteRose1
WhiteRose1 e2 Member 41073 forum postsWhiteRose1 vcard England136 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 8:24 AM

The solarisation gives a bit of a mottled effect to the clouds, would be interesting to see non-solarised versions alongside. I'm probably leaning towards v1 for the crop, did you try less of a crop with the horizon on the bottom third?

Dave

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Earbypics
Earbypics e2 Member 1Earbypics vcard United Kingdom2 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 9:04 AMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

I like this image, lovely contrast, excellent use of shutter speed. Prefer the mono versions but would lose some more of the lower part of the image, the large mass of black, or even work at bringing some of the detail of the foreground out? Nice though! Wink

Martin

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Nikonuser1
Nikonuser1 e2 Member 2Nikonuser1 vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 9:15 AM

Great image. v2 for me.Smile

Cliff

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

andylea
andylea  637 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 9:18 AM

brilliant tones and light mark v1 just nicks it for me today a cracking mono nice one Wink
andy

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

capto
capto e2 Member 21275 forum postscapto vcard United Kingdom7 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 9:57 AM

V2 for me. You have done well to get something from such a challenging original image.Smile

ivor

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

jasonrwl
jasonrwl e2 Member 4257 forum postsjasonrwl vcard United Kingdom8 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 9:58 AM

The effect works extremely well Mark - must give that a go some time. Can't make my mind up between v1 and v2 - both excellent.
Jason

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Irishkate
Irishkate e2 Member 4Irishkate vcard United Kingdom73 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 11:07 AM

Your original image V3 has more detail in the f/g but the solarised versions
add interest to the sky and make great monos. V2 does have the edge I think
with nicely balanced light on both sides.
Worth doing more of these Mark.
KateGrinGrinGrin

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Skeet1Away
Skeet1Away e2 Member 342 forum postsSkeet1Away vcard Scotland1 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 1:45 PM

Mark, v1 works very well for me.......a fantastic mix of tones producing dramatic detail. I've always said some shots are just right for mono and this is one of them......nice work mate. I some how now think when looking at an image that the colour can be very pleasing but letting the artistic side of us come out in processing can make for a truly stunning image...........just as you have shown here.


Paul.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

alistairfarrugia
alistairfarrugia Critique Team 2164 forum posts Malta88 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 2:53 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Firstly, well done on the end result. It's a great image. I do have some comments to make though, so I will combine in my comment a lot of what the others said, as it tallies with what I think could be done better here, plus I'll add my 2 cents worth.

First off, the black land-part in the foreground - I agree that you need to lift the shadows a bit to recover some details there as it will only help give the image more context.

Secondly, I think both mono-versions are a bit over-sharpened, I can see over-sharpening halos along the arches of the bridge for instance - they don't show up that much in the original. If you tone down your sharpness, you don't lose much as the image's strength doesn't lie in how detailed it is, but rather on the effect you have put and the mood you created.

Finally, I think V1 is my favourite, as it gives more space to the sky and the change of colour that takes place there, and it also places the horizon on the lower third. V2's horizon is a bit too central for my liking.

As I said, just my 2 cents worth, image is still great regardless of my critique, well done!

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

AnnChown
AnnChown e2 Member 4183 forum postsAnnChown vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
26 Jan 2013 - 3:12 PM

I really can't decide between v1 and v2 Mark as they're both excellently processed. Is this Southampton - and if so, St Mary's Church on the horizon? (I was married there many years ago - the first time round!!! SmileSmile)
Ann

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Chinga
Chinga e2 Member 3Chinga vcard United Kingdom
26 Jan 2013 - 11:35 PM

Very good! Grin
IB

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

Richard_OSullivan

stunning image very nicely done

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

ollimar71
ollimar71 e2 Member 4ollimar71 vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
25 Apr 2013 - 8:18 PM

A great result. The original looks so dull - had it been mine I would have given up on it (and I would have been wrong to), but you've achieved a great B&W conversion from it. For me the solarisation is what makes it work - making the image really strong and full of dramatic contrast.
As far as the crop is concerned - both versions have their own interpretation and work just as well. V1 gives me lots of impressive sky. V2 gives me the powerful expanse of the bridge. It really depends on what works for you and to judge from the title you wanted the bridge to stand out Smile
Nice one - well seen and well processed Smile
Maria

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

adriansart
8 Jul 2013 - 3:12 PM

Fantastic Mark, The fact that you have converted it into b/w works in its favour this really does help with the dramatic looing light and darks of the image this is what b/w photography is all about moods!

Love that expanse of bridge running across the image and those low perspectives and angles are well thought out, the contrasts that the concrete gives set against that fantastic looking sky makes a great focal point, the sky itself is an image all on its own, it have movement, power and give the eye something to go beyond the bridge this is reflected in the river as well giving the image sort of layers of light and dark, and the fact that the long exposure has been applied brings the image above the norm and makes it something different and special, if it were in colour there would be no real impact in my eyes as much as the b/w offers!

Adrian.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.