Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Clock tower

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Add Comment

A shot of the Furman Clock Tower from up close, and converted to a B&W photo using Photoshop Elements 8.0

Camera:Nikon D3000 Check out Nikon Nation!
Lens:55mm
Recording media:JPEG (digital)
Title:Clock tower
Username:SCJohnJ SCJohnJ
Uploaded:2 Apr 2010 - 2:07 PM
Tags:Architecture, Black & white, Clock tower
VS Mode Rating 102 (100% won)
These stats show the percentage of wins and the rating score that your photo has achieved. You can go to the VS Mode by clicking on this icon.

Signup to e2

Signup to e2 to see which photo this has won or lost against in the vs mode
Votes:Voting Disabled
Critque wantedCritique Wanted
Has Modifications Modifications Welcome (Upload a Modification)
Awards have been disabled on this photo

Comments

This photo is here for critique. Please only comment constructively and with suggestions on how to improve it.
DRicherby
DRicherby  5269 forum posts United Kingdom725 Constructive Critique Points
2 Apr 2010 - 2:48 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

You've chosen a dramatic viewpoint and composed and exposed the shot well. The fluffy clouds give the sky plenty of interest.

However, I find the photograph rather flat. I'm not sure it's lacking contrast per se but it seems to be lacking in features that would give the opportunity for contrast. In particular, the walls have been rendered as flat slabs of grey, which doesn't give much opportunity for apparent contrast. I assume the walls are mortared stone blocks but that is barely visible in the photograph and I think that preserving that detail is important. On the other hand, if the walls are plastered, I'm not sure there's much you can do about it and shooting from a different angle might be a better option.

The shot also looks a little soft to me, especially the clock face. It might just be that you forgot to sharpen after resizing, which you should always do, because sharpness depends on pixel-level detail at edges that gets lost when you resize. Or there may be a small amount of camera shake or insufficient depth of field; one can only speculate without knowing the camera settings. In any case, the softness is only slight and it responds well to software sharpening.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

SCJohnJ
SCJohnJ  4 United States
2 Apr 2010 - 5:45 PM

Thank you for the constructive points! I can't recall offhand whether or not the walls of the tower are mortared or plastered. I'll have to check the next time I go out there for photos. It seems they were very smooth, though. And you're right about not "sharpening after resizing". I have to admit I've not done that with Photoshop Elements 8.0 and need to find out how that is accomplished. I've not purchased the software yet, only using it as a trial offer to see how I like it. I sold my Mac that had Adobe Photoshop on it, and knew how to sharpen with that program. Anyway, I sure appreciate your taking the time to look at my photos! I'm certainly learning a lot! Regards, John J. in SC

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

arhb
arhb e2 Member 72190 forum postsarhb vcard United Kingdom67 Constructive Critique Points
3 Apr 2010 - 5:48 PMConstructive Critique!This comment was flagged as constructive critique! 

Hi John, nice shot taken from an interesting angle, and as has been mentioned, some good sky interest with the clouds. The image looks great in mono also.
In my mod, I have added more contrast/shadow to the RH elevation, to add some more interest.
If it is of any help, when I sharpen after re-sizing for web, I generally find the the un-sharp mask tool(USM) works well, when set at around 70-0.7-0 for the respective settings, top to bottom.
Also worth mentioning, this same tool(USM), is great for dreating contrast in architectre, when set between 20-20-0 and 40-40-0.
It needs to be experimented with, but worth it.
Hope this helps.

Nominating Constructive Critique

Please ensure that you understand what is meant by Constructive Critique - see FAQ here. If you still wish to nominate this comment click Yes

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.